Consultation and the VPS Code of Conduct In July, the Library consulted with various authors as part of their promised "duty of care review." One of those authors, Jess Walton, documented the experience in detail in a thread on
X (Twitter). She reported that the Library repeatedly expressed an intention to request artists to sign the
Victorian Public Servants Code of Conduct in future, which, Walton observed, would make it legally enforceable to fire them based on political commentary they have made on social media. Walton reported that the Library's Kath Green did not address these concerns directly, but reasserted that the review was based on "duty of care for everyone involved... the children who are the participants in the program, but also presenters, facilitators, the staff supporting those facilitators - we should have been better. We should have been on top of that."
Contents of the review The Duty of Care Review, led by Helen Conway and Tony Grybowski and Associates, was released by the Library and published on their website on 7 August 2024. The report makes the following recommendations: The Library have committed to "adopting all ten recommendations", adding that they are "committed to providing a welcoming, inclusive, and respectful place for cultural expression and engagement."
Subsequent Duldig ABC interview and retirement On 20 August 2024, Duldig spoke about the matter to
ABC Radio Melbourne's Raf Epstein. Duldig again insisted that the workshops were not cancelled, but rather postponed, and that the issue had been related to "duty of care" and the need to create "a safe and respectful place for everyone." He also added that the Library "had done the work as an institution to be resilient around the drag queen story time but (wasn't) ready to face the challenges of dealing with hate speech and other things that related to Gaza." Duldig denied that pressure from Library donors motivated the decision. On 21 July 2025, the Library announced that Duldig would retire "at the conclusion of his current contract, to focus on family responsibilities interstate."
Subsequent Christine Christian interview On 7 June 2025, Library board member Christine Christian discussed the matter in the
Australian Financial Review. The Review's article reported - in the body of the article itself, without quoting Christian directly - that the Library made the decision
because the authors were critical of Israel: The article also quotes Christian as saying the decision was made because of "the possibility of unaccompanied minors being exposed to what could be considered hate speech... This was about minors and our duty of care – some participants [in the boot camp] were as young as seven.” ==See also==