Action principles are "
integral" approaches rather than the "
differential" approach of
Newtonian mechanics. The core ideas are based on energy, paths, an energy function called the Lagrangian along paths, and selection of a path according to the "action", a continuous sum or integral of the Lagrangian along the path.
Energy, not force Introductory study of mechanics, the science of interacting objects, typically begins with
Newton's laws based on the concept of
force, defined by the acceleration it causes when applied to
mass: . This approach to mechanics focuses on a single point in space and time, attempting to answer the question: "What happens next?". Mechanics based on action principles begin with the concept of
action, an energy tradeoff between
kinetic energy and
potential energy, defined by the physics of the problem. These approaches answer questions relating starting and ending points: Which trajectory will place a basketball in the hoop? If we launch a rocket to the Moon today, how can it land there in 5 days? Using energy rather than force gives immediate advantages as a basis for mechanics. Force mechanics involves three-dimensional
vector calculus, with three space and three momentum coordinates for each object in the scenario; energy is a scalar magnitude combining information from all objects, giving an immediate simplification in many cases. The components of force vary with coordinate systems; the energy value is the same in all coordinate systems. once velocities approach the
speed of light,
special relativity profoundly affects mechanics based on forces. In action principles, relativity merely requires a different Lagrangian: the principle itself is independent of coordinate systems.
Paths, not points The explanatory diagrams in force-based mechanics usually focus on a single point, like the
center of momentum, and show vectors of forces and velocities. The explanatory diagrams of action-based mechanics have two points with actual and possible paths connecting them. : action S = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \bigl( \text{KE}(t) - \text{PE}(t)\bigr) \,dt, where the form of the kinetic energy () and potential energy () expressions depend upon the physics problem, and their value at each point on the path depends upon relative coordinates corresponding to that point. The energy function is called a Lagrangian; in simple problems it is the kinetic energy minus the potential energy of the system.
Path variation In classical mechanics, a system moving between two points takes one particular path; other similar paths are not taken. Each conceivable path corresponds to a value of the action. An action principle predicts or explains that the particular path taken has a stationary value for the system's action: similar paths near the one taken have very similar action value. This variation in the action value is key to the action principles. In quantum mechanics, every possible path contributes an amplitude to the system's behavior, with the phase of each amplitude determined by the action for that path (phase = ). The classical path emerges because: • Only near the path of stationary action do neighboring paths have similar phases, leading to
constructive interference, • Neighboring paths have rapidly varying actions with the phase that
interfere with other paths, When the scale of the problem is much larger than the
Planck constant (the classical limit), only the stationary action path survives the interference. The symbol is used to indicate the path
variations so an action principle appears mathematically as : (\delta S)_C = 0, meaning that at the
stationary point, the variation of the action with some fixed constraints is zero. For action principles, the stationary point may be a minimum or a
saddle point, but not a maximum. Elliptical planetary orbits provide a simple example of two paths with equal action one in each direction around the orbit; neither can be the minimum or "least action". For examples, a Lagrangian independent of time corresponds to a system with conserved energy; spatial translation independence implies momentum conservation; angular rotation invariance implies angular momentum conservation. These examples are global symmetries, where the independence is itself independent of space or time; more general
local symmetries having a functional dependence on space or time lead to
gauge theory. The observed conservation of
isospin was used by
Yang Chen-Ning and
Robert Mills in 1953 to construct a gauge theory for
mesons, leading some decades later to
modern particle physics theory. == Distinct principles ==