Journeys of Marduk The statue was first stolen from the city when King
Mursili I of the
Hittites sacked Babylon 1595 BC. Mursili's war against Babylon ended the city's first dynasty and left its empire in ruins. Although Babylon rebuilt its kingdom under the
Kassite dynasty, the statue spent centuries in the kingdom of the Hittites, possibly being returned 1344 BC by King
Šuppiluliuma I as a gesture of goodwill. The statue then remained in Babylon until the
Assyrian king
Tukulti-Ninurta I captured Babylon in 1225 BC, when he plundered the city and carried the statue away to the Assyrian capital,
Assur. What exactly happened thereafter is unclear, but it was returned and then later, for unknown reasons, moved to the nearby city
Sippar. Sippar was sacked 1150 BC by the
Elamites under their king,
Shutruk-Nakhunte, who stole the statue, carrying it to his homeland Elam. The statue was successfully seized and returned to Babylon after the Babylonian king
Nebuchadnezzar I (1125–1104 BC) campaigned against the Elamites. Nebuchadnezzar's successful return of the statue to the city was a monumentous event and several literary works were created to commemorate it, possibly including an early version of the
Enûma Eliš. The
Neo-Assyrian King
Tiglath-Pileser III conquered Babylon in October 729 BC, after which the Neo-Assyrian monarchs proclaimed themselves as kings of Babylon in addition to already being
kings of Assyria.'''''' As vengeance after a series of revolts, the Neo-Assyrian king
Sennacherib plundered and destroyed Babylon in 689 BC. Sennacherib had been seen as heretical by the Babylonians, as he had not gone through with the traditional coronation ritual (with the statue) when he had proclaimed himself as Babylon's king. Following the destruction of the city, Sennacherib stole the statue and it was kept at the town of
Issete in the northeastern parts of Assyria.'''''' When Sennacherib was murdered by his sons
Arda-Mulissu and
Sharezer in 681 BC, the Babylonians saw it as Marduk's divine retribution. Sennacherib's successor as Assyrian king,
Esarhaddon, rebuilt Babylon in the 670s BC, restoring the Esagila. Under Esarhaddon's guidance, a
pedestal in gold (intended to support the returned statue) was created in the Esagila.'''''' The statue was finally returned to the city during the coronation of Esarhaddon's successor as Babylonian king,
Shamash-shum-ukin, in the spring of 668 BC.'''''' It is possible that Sennacherib actually destroyed the original statue and the statue returned to Babylon in 668 BC was a replica; some of Sennacherib's inscriptions allude to smashing the statues of the gods in Babylon while others explicitly state that the Marduk statue was carried to Assyria. Assyrian control of Babylon was ended with the successful revolt of
Nabopolassar in 626 BC, which established the
Neo-Babylonian Empire. Nabopolassar's son and heir,
Nebuchadnezzar II (605–562 BC) widened the streets of Babylon so that the parade of the statue through the city at the New Year's festival would be made easier. The Neo-Babylonian Empire was ended with the conquest of Babylon by
Cyrus the Great of the
Achaemenid Empire in 539 BC. Cyrus showed respect for the city and the statue and his own inscriptions surrounding his conquest of the city explicitly state that Marduk was on his side in the war. Though the statue was often used as a means of psychological warfare by removing it from the city, powerful foreign rulers who did so had a tendency to die at the hands of their own family members. Mursili I, Shutruk-Nakhunte, Tukulti-Ninurta I, Sennacherib and the later
Xerxes I were all killed by members of their own families.'''''' Such deaths, as can be seen in the Babylonian reaction to Sennacherib's murder in particular, were hailed by the Babylonians as divine punishment.''''''
Xerxes and Babylon In 484 BC, during the reign of the Achaemenid king Xerxes I, Babylon produced two contemporary revolts against Achaemenid rule, the revolts being led by rebel leaders
Bel-shimanni and
Shamash-eriba. Prior to these revolts, Babylon had occupied a special position within the Achaemenid Empire, the Achaemenid kings had been titled as
king of Babylon and king of the Lands, perceiving Babylonia as a somewhat separate entity within their empire, united with their own kingdom in a
personal union. Xerxes gradually dropped the previous royal title and divided the previously large Babylonian satrapy (accounting for most of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's territory) into smaller sub-units. Using texts written by classical authors, it is often assumed that Xerxes enacted a brutal vengeance on Babylon following the two revolts. According to ancient writers, Xerxes destroyed Babylon's fortifications and damaged the temples in the city. The Esagila was allegedly exposed to great damage and Xerxes allegedly carried the statue of Marduk away from the city, possibly bringing it to Iran and melting it down (classical authors held that the statue was entirely made of gold, which would have made melting it down possible). Historian
Amélie Kuhrt considers it unlikely that Xerxes destroyed the temples, but believes that the story of him doing so may derive from an anti-Persian sentiment among the Babylonians. The story of Xerxes melting the statue comes chiefly from the ancient Greek writer
Herodotus, who isn't otherwise considered entirely reliable and has been noted as being very anti-Persian. Joshua J. Mark, writing in the
Ancient History Encyclopedia, believes that the account of Herodotus, a Persian king destroying the statue of the deity of a city he just razed, could be anti-Persian propaganda. Furthermore, it is doubtful if the statue was removed from Babylon at all. In
From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire (2002),
Pierre Briant considered it possible that Xerxes did remove a statue from the city, but that this was the golden statue of a man rather than the statue of the god Marduk. Though mentions of the statue are lacking compared to earlier periods, contemporary documents suggest that the Babylonian New Year's Festival continued in some form during the Persian period. Because the change in rulership from the Babylonians themselves to the Persians and due to the replacement of the city's elite families by Xerxes following its revolt, it is possible that the festival's traditional rituals and events had changed considerably. Although contemporary evidence for Xerxes's retribution against Babylon is missing, later authors mention the damage he inflicted upon the city's temples. For instance, both the Roman historian
Arrian and the Greek historian
Diodorus Siculus describe how
Alexander the Great restored some temples in the city which had been destroyed or damaged by Xerxes.
Later mentions Arrian and Diodorus Siculus do not mention the Statue of Marduk, sometimes interpreted as indicating that the statue was no longer in the Esagila by Alexander's time. However, the statue was demonstrably still present in the Esagila, since its crown is mentioned as having been restored by Alexander in 325 BC. The crown is described as being horned, horned crowns being an ancient Mesopotamian way to indicate divinity, conflicting with how the statue's crown is portrayed in ancient Babylonian depictions. Due to his efforts to respect local religious customs in Mesopotamia, American historian Oliver D. Hoover speculated in 2011 that
Seleucus I Nicator (305–281 BC), the first king of the
Seleucid Empire, might have undergone a traditional Babylonian coronation ceremony during a New Year's Festival in Babylon, involving the statue. Several later rulers are referenced as giving gifts "to Marduk" in the Esagila. Seleucus I's son and successor,
Antiochus I Soter, sacrificed to Marduk several times during his time as crown prince. A late reference comes from the period of Parthian rule in Mesopotamia, with the
Characenean ruler
Hyspaosines attested as giving gifts "to Marduk" in 127 BC. There are no known sources that mention the New Year's Festival as a contemporary event from the time of the Seleucids and onwards and one of the last times the tradition is known to have been celebrated is 188 BC. During the festival of 188 BC,
Antiochus III, great-grandson of Antiochus I, prominently partook and was given various valuables, including a golden crown and the royal robe of Nebuchadnezzar II, by Babylon's high priest at the Esagila. The statue was a known historical object as late as the time of Parthian rule beyond Hyspaosines's time, from which a ritual text describes its role in the New Year's festival, including how the
Enûma Eliš was recited in front of it and how the ancient kings of Babylon were supposed to be ritually slapped during the festival. == References ==