Stephenson 2 DFK 49 was known to be an interesting object since its home cluster was first studied in depth. Using the SED, Humphreys (2020) estimates a luminosity of . However, it is noted that the estimated luminosity may be an underestimate because it does not include excess radiation from warm dust.
Temperature and Spectrum Davies (2007) estimated its temperature of , but with an uncertainty in the measurement of ± 112 K. 5 years later, Fok (2012) estimated a slightly cooler temperature at . A more recent study estimated the star's temperature at a hotter , based on its spectral type of K4.
Size Davies (2007) estimates a temperature of , with a luminosity of . Applying the
Stefan-Boltzmann law, Stephenson 2 DFK 49’s radius would be , making it one of the largest stars known. A 2012 study published the estimated properties of numerous red supergiants and other supergiant stars using Spectral Energy Distributions, including Stephenson 2 DFK 49. The study estimates its temperature at a slightly cooler but its luminosity at a much lower . This would imply a radius of only , smaller than the radius implied by Davies (2007). Humphreys (2020) estimates Stephenson 2 DFK 49's temperature at , but a higher luminosity of . Applying the Stefan-Boltzmann law, its radius would be , larger than the other two estimates.
Mass loss and maser emissions While Davies (2007) does not estimate a mass loss rate for Stephenson 2 DFK 49, the study mentions that it would be interesting to estimate its mass loss rate. In 2012, it was noted for having
maser emissions at certain spectral lines. A 2020 study later determines a mass loss rate of per year based on several computer models, but it is noted that these rates are not high for other hypergiant stars such as VY Canis Majoris,
NML Cygni, and IRC +10420. As a possible post-red supergiant star, Stephenson 2 DFK 49 likely experiences both constant and variable mass-loss rates. ==Evolution and future==