The following are some of his more notable judicial opinions: •
Cardoza-Fonseca v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 767 F.2d 1448 (9th Cir. 1985). ::*The INS had conflated two different routes for seeking asylum and had improperly rejected an application made under one route based on the requirements of the second. This decision was upheld by the Supreme Court. •
Coleman v. Risley, 839 F.2d 434 (9th Cir. 1988). ::*Standard to obtain asylum. •
Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official English, 939 F.2d 727 (9th Cir. 1991), adopted en banc, 69 F.3d 920 (9th Cir 1995). ::*The English-only provision in the Arizona constitution was overly broad and violated the First Amendment right of free speech. This decision was vacated by the Supreme Court as moot because plaintiff Yniguez had voluntarily left the employment of the State of Arizona the day after the appeal was filed. 520 US 43. Justice Ginsburg's unanimous opinion for the Court also took a swipe at the Ninth Circuit for failing to certify this question to the state courts, holding that "A more cautious approach was in order. In addition, footnote 11 of Justice Ginsburg's opinion chided the Ninth Circuit for failing to recognize that state courts are not bound by decisions of federal courts (except the Supreme Court), even on questions of federal law. •
Sanders v. Ratelle, 21 F.3d 1446 (9th Cir. 1994). ::*The Sixth Amendment right to counsel can be infringed if counsel has a conflict of interest, even if the defendant has waived the conflict. •
Compassion in Dying v. Washington, 79 F.3d 790 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc). ::*A statute prohibiting doctors from prescribing life-ending medication for the terminally ill violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit in
Washington v. Glucksberg (1997). •
Ma v. Reno, 208 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2000). ::*An alien cannot be held indefinitely in detention in the absence of a repatriation agreement with his or her country of origin. •
Silveira v. Lockyer, 312 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2002). ::*The right to bear arms is a collective right, not an individual right. This ruling was overruled by the Supreme Court in
D.C. v. Heller (2008). •
United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins (9th Cir. 2008) ::*Forfeiture of the shark fins was denied on the grounds that, although according to the Shark Finning Prohibition Act of 2000, any shark fins found aboard a fishing vessel without a corresponding shark carcass may be deemed the product of illegal harvesting, the vessel from which the fins were seized was not in fact a fishing vessel within the meaning of the act. The fins had been harvested by, and bought from, other vessels. •
In The Matter of Brad Levenson (2009) ::*In his role as Chair of the Ninth Circuit’s Standing Committee on Federal Public Defenders, Reinhardt ruled that the application of the
Defense of Marriage Act in denying health insurance benefits to Levenson's same-sex spouse violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. •
Perry v. Brown (2012) ::*Writing for the majority, Reinhardt held that
Proposition 8 violated the
Equal Protection Clause because California had no rational basis for withdrawing the right to marry from homosexual men and women. •
Cooper v. Brown, 565 F.3d 581 (2009). ::*Reinhardt wrote a dissenting opinion, where he suggested the Ninth Circuit disclose the names of judges who vote for and against en banc rehearing of cases. •
Hernandez v. Chappell (December 29, 2017) ::*Reinhardt ruled that Hernandez was mentally ill and therefore could not be executed. Overturned by the Ninth Circuit in 2019. ==Awards==