It is widely acknowledged that style drift is a common practice particularly by
active mutual funds in the financial markets. While
passive funds (often called "
index funds") employ a
buy and hold strategy often following an index, active funds take on an active investment approach by picking stocks that move in and out of the market. It is therefore common for active funds to embrace different investment styles and consequently, investors of active mutual funds need to keep an eye on their fund's risks exposure since style drift can impact risk exposure. The rise of funds’ investment styles can be traced back to studies on
market anomalies. Researchers here view that stock returns are driven by factors related to “size”. and “valuation” effects other than a single factor exposure of market risk under the assumptions of the
Capital Asset Pricing Model (“CAPM”) developed by Sharpe-Lintner-Mossin in the 1960s. The findings that stocks have distinctive characteristics exist, resulted in the rise of investment style. This stock style, in turn, has prompted the creation of numerous style indexes to track various stock market segments, for example, Standard &Poor’s (S&P) style indices 500 (
S&P 500) to represent large-cap market, mid-cap market is represented by S&P mid-cap 400, small-cap market is represented by S&P small-cap 600, growth and value indices. Depending on a fund's investment objective, its fund manager must adopt various investment strategies (see
Investment strategy) in its portfolio construction to add value to fund returns. Strategies can be categorized into: •
technical analysis – contrarian or momentum approach; and/or • anomalies/stock attributes—
calendar effect, stock characteristics with respect to size, value or growth. It is an industry-wide practice that mutual funds are categorized into investment styles that reflect the investment objectives and the underlying strategy of funds. The practice is brought about by a market anomaly in a
financial market demonstrating that different investment styles have dissimilar risk and return characteristics that serves important implications on fund
performance attribution and outcome. == Style drift definition and metrics ==