Sound quality parameters achievable by the Red Book
CD-DA and SACD formats compared with the limits of human hearing are as follows: ; CD: Dynamic range: 90 dB; 120 dB (with shaped
dither); frequency range: 20 Hz20 kHz ; SACD: Dynamic range: 105 dB; frequency range: 20 Hz50 kHz ; Human hearing: Dynamic range: 120 dB; frequency range: 20 Hz20 kHz (young person); 20 Hz8–15 kHz (middle-aged adult) In September 2007, the Audio Engineering Society published the results of a year-long trial, in which a range of subjects—including professional recording engineers—were asked to discern the difference between
high-resolution audio sources (including SACD and
DVD-Audio) and a compact disc audio (44.1 kHz/16 bit) conversion of the same source material under
double-blind test conditions. Out of 554 trials, there were 276 correct answers, a 49.8% success rate corresponding almost exactly to the 50% that would have been expected by
chance guessing alone. When the level of the signal was elevated by 14 dB or more, the test subjects were able to detect the higher
noise floor of the CD-quality loop easily. The authors commented: Following criticism that the original published results of the study were not sufficiently detailed, the AES published a list of the audio equipment and recordings used during the tests. Since the Meyer–Moran study in 2007, approximately 80 studies have been published on high-resolution audio, about half of which included blind tests.
Joshua Reiss performed a meta-analysis on 20 of the published tests that included sufficient experimental detail and data. In a paper published in the July 2016 issue of the AES Journal, Reiss says that, although the individual tests had mixed results, and that the effect was "small and difficult to detect," the overall result was that trained listeners could distinguish between high-resolution recordings and their CD equivalents under blind conditions: "Overall, there was a small but statistically significant ability to discriminate between standard-quality audio (44.1 or 48 kHz, 16 bit) and high-resolution audio (beyond standard quality). When subjects were trained, the ability to discriminate was far more significant." Hiroshi Nittono pointed out that the results in Reiss's paper showed that the ability to distinguish high-resolution audio from CD-quality audio was "only slightly better than chance." Contradictory results have been found when comparing DSD and high-resolution PCM formats.
Double-blind listening tests in 2004 between DSD and 24-bit, 176.4 kHz PCM recordings reported that among test subjects no significant differences could be heard. DSD advocates and equipment manufacturers continue to assert an improvement in sound quality above PCM 24-bit 176.4 kHz. A 2003 study found that despite both formats' extended frequency responses, people could not distinguish audio with information above 21 kHz from audio without such high-frequency content. In a 2014 study, however, Marui et al. found that under double-blind conditions, listeners were able to distinguish between PCM (192 kHz/24 bits) and DSD (2.8 MHz) or DSD (5.6 MHz) recording formats, preferring the qualitative features of DSD, but could not discriminate between the two DSD formats. == Playback hardware ==