In February 1992, during
the U.S. presidential primaries for what would be
his unsuccessful re-election campaign, U.S. President
George H. W. Bush attended a convention of the National Grocers Association in
Orlando. The sole newspaper journalist permitted to cover the appearance, Gregg McDonald for the
Houston Chronicle, filed a two-paragraph
pool report that mentioned in passing the president's "look of wonder" as he interacted with a supermarket electronic
barcode scanner demonstration. Before giving a speech to the grocers, Bush browsed new grocer technology, including a model checkout counter by
NCR Corporation. He was impressed by their new scanner technology, which could weigh produce and read damaged barcodes. The reporter did not consider the aspect of Bush's reaction to be significant enough to cover in his final story. Based on McDonald's pool report,
Andrew Rosenthal, a reporter for
The New York Times, wrote a front-page story about Bush's appearance at the convention that painted him as being out-of-touch with everyday American life. Titled "Bush Encounters the Supermarket, Amazed", the story contextualized Bush as being among the
social elite, quoted him as being "amazed by some of the technology", and presented him as witnessing supermarket electronic
barcode scanner technology, which had been in use for some 16 years, for the first time.
Pundits, broadcasters,
political cartoonists, and
columnists picked up the story, casting Bush as understanding neither commonplace supermarket occurrences nor daily life in America. Other major news outlets did not agree with
The New York Times interpretation, as
Time and
Newsweek described the scene as unexceptional news and Bush as unamazed. The individual who performed the demonstration said that Bush was familiar with conventional scanner technology. As
Time later put it, all eyewitness accounts refuted
The New York Times story.
CBS Radio correspondent
Charles Osgood corrected his prior broadcast.
The New York Times did not issue a correction, defending the report and citing video footage in which Bush interacted with conventional and new scanners and was both "unfamiliar with" and "clearly impressed" by conventional scanners. For its part, the
White House belatedly decried the mischaracterization a week later. Bush himself angrily wrote to
The New York Times chairman
Arthur Ochs Sulzberger decrying inaccuracies in the report. In a reply, Sulzberger conceded that the article had been mildly "naughty" and that the paper did not expect it to attract the attention it had. == Legacy and comparisons ==