Attempt by Pakubuwono XII In 1948, Law No. 22 article 18 paragraph 5 was issued to regulate regional government, stating that the Head of the Special Region was appointed by the President from the descendants of the ruling family from before the Republic of Indonesia, but in the discussion of the Central Indonesian National Committee session, several words in article 18 were changed. The changes became clearer when on 24 November 1951, Pakubuwono XII received a letter sent by the
Soekiman Cabinet (Surat No. 66/5/38) stating that the new draft government regulation was not in accordance with Law No. 22 article 15. Law No. 22 article 15 and that he was summoned to clarify the status. In a last attempt, Pakubuwono XII had tried to restore the status of Surakarta Special Region. On 15 January 1952, Pakubuwono XII gave a lengthy explanation about Surakarta Special Region to the
Cabinet of Indonesia in Jakarta, on this occasion he explained that the
Swapraja Government was unable to overcome the turmoil and undermining accompanied by armed threats, while the
Swapraja Government itself had no means of power. However, these efforts faltered because they never reached a consensus, on the basis of trivial issues can complicate matters.
Recent developments in the Reformation era Along with the reopening of the spirit of regional autonomy and with the granting of Special Autonomy to Papua (2001), West Papua (2008), Aceh (2001 and 2006), DKI Jakarta (1999 and 2007) followed by Central Papua, South Papua, Mountainous Papua and Southwest Papua (2022) and the affirmation of the privileges of Aceh (1999 and 2006) and Yogyakarta (2012), there is a discourse to revive the Special Region of Surakarta as part of the Republic of Indonesia. One of the steps that will be taken is to conduct a judicial review to the
Constitutional Court of the Law on the State of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 1950. On 14 December 2010, a group of people held a demonstration and a joint prayer, known as
Ritual Wilujengan, at the border of Yogyakarta Province, near the south side of
Prambanan Temple area. The protesters demanded the government's promise to give them as a special region, in accordance with UUD 45 article 18 and that they would go to the Constitutional Court if not fulfilled. Attended by those who claimed to be delegates from the community in across the greater Solo area, the demonstrators wore traditional Javanese clothes in Solo style with yellow Kasunanan necklaces. They also carried red and white banners with historical facts. On 26 June 2013, a lawsuit was filed to the Constitutional Court by two purported members of the royal family of Surakarta. Stating that they want to establish a special autonomous region for their territory on behalf of the Kasunanan. The petitioners contended that the Special Region of Surakarta held historical and constitutional significance, possessing its own government and culture. They argued that the region's dissolution and subsequent integration into Central Java Province contravened the provisions outlined in the 1945 Constitution. They challenge a 1950 law that abolished the residency system and merged Surakarta with other regions into Central Java province. The lawsuit garnered media attention, which prompted a reaction from then elected governor of Central Java,
Ganjar Pranowo and his provincial government. Central Java provincial council gave out a statement of disagreement with the demand for Surakarta Special Region. While Ganjar stated that he would respect whatever decision the Constitutional Court makes regarding the lawsuit and that the matter of Surakarta Special Region is up to the president and the
parliament, while the governor and the provincial council can only give recommendations after a thorough study. Though, he questioned the rationale behind the demand for Surakarta Special Region, and whether it would improve governance and public service, as it could create unrest among the people. On 27 March 2014, the Constitutional Court ultimately dismissed the petition challenging the validity of Law No. 10 of 1950 concerning the Establishment of Central Java Province. The court based its ruling on the lack of legal standing of the petitioners in requesting the legal status of Surakarta Special Region. Moreover, the court raised doubts regarding the legitimacy of one of the petitioners, who claimed to be the son of Susuhunan Pakubuwono XII, the final ruler of the Surakarta Palace. The
Minister of Youth and Sports Affairs,
Roy Suryo, who is a relative of the
Yogyakartan Keraton supports the decision of the Constitutional Court and, without explaining further, stated that there is a difference between the
Surakarta Keraton and the Yogyakarta Keraton during the independence era. A member of the Surakarta Palace's Traditional Council, Satriyo Hadinagoro, criticizes the Constitutional Court's ruling and called it "funny and unreasonable" and said that his side would file another lawsuit. He also questioned Roy Suryo’s involvement in the palace conflict.
2025 re-establishment debate In late 2024 and early 2025, discussions resurfaced regarding the potential establishment of the Special Region of Surakarta in Indonesia. The proposal would involve separating the city of Surakarta (Solo) and its surrounding areas from Central Java Province, granting it a special provincial status akin to that of the Special Region of Yogyakarta. National attention to the idea increased on 24 April 2025, during a hearing of the
House of Representatives (DPR) Commission II, which oversees regional governance. In the meeting,
Akmal Malik, Director General of Regional Autonomy at the
Ministry of Home Affairs, reported that, as of April 2025, 42 requests to form new provinces and six requests for special regional status, including that of Surakarta, had been submitted.
Aria Bima, Deputy Chair of DPR Commission II, highlighted the proposal for Surakarta, noting its historical and cultural significance. He stated that there had been input suggesting that Solo should be separated from Central Java and established as a special region. The public acknowledgment of the proposal in this forum brought renewed national attention to the issue. The latest wave of discussion marks the first major resurgence of the proposal in recent years, reaching higher political levels through parliamentary discourse and broader media coverage than previous attempts by the Surakarta Keraton. Aria acknowledged that Surakarta's unique history, particularly its contributions to
anti-colonial resistance and rich cultural identity, underpins the rationale for the proposal. However, he questioned whether such historical factors make the move urgent or necessary today. In his view, there is no pressing need for special status, suggesting that the DPR’s Commission II is not prioritizing the issue. Tito further distinguished this proposal from the current national moratorium on the creation of new administrative regions, noting that a request for special region status differs from forming an ordinary new province. While the creation of a special region would still involve establishing a new autonomous administrative unit, it may be treated with separate considerations if it fulfills the required criteria. From the
Presidential Office (Istana), the official response to the proposal for a Special Region of Surakarta has been neutral. Deputy
Minister of State Secretariat (Wamensesneg)
Juri Ardiantoro stated that, as of the end of April 2025, there had been no formal discussion or decision regarding the proposal. He urged all parties to remain patient until any official deliberations take place. Juri further noted that he had not received detailed information on the specific justifications behind the proposal for Surakarta’s special status and observed that various regional reorganization proposals are currently under consideration across Indonesia. == References ==