People still refer to the "Big Five", but many deem the classification outdated. Several critics have suggested that the top echelon be expanded, including Michael Walsh in
Time magazine in 1983; and
Mark Swed in the
Los Angeles Times, 2005. Among the orchestras proposed for inclusion are the
Los Angeles Philharmonic, the
Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra, the
Houston Symphony, the
National Symphony Orchestra (
Washington, D.C.), and the
St. Louis Symphony Orchestra. Seven American orchestras were numbered among the world's top 20 in a 2008 critics' poll by
Gramophone. They were, in rank order, the Chicago Symphony Orchestra (5th), the Cleveland Orchestra (7th), the Los Angeles Philharmonic (8th), the Boston Symphony Orchestra (11th), the New York Philharmonic (12th), the San Francisco Symphony (13th), and the
Metropolitan Opera Orchestra (New York City) (18th). In the 21st century, some observers of American orchestras suggest that the "Big Five" designation is no longer meaningful. Gary Hanson, former executive director of the Cleveland Orchestra, commented in 2013 that an orchestra's reputation was once an important factor in its "ability to compete for talent", meaning "there was a direct relationship between reputation and quality." Greater
geographic mobility of musicians, the rarity of major orchestral
recording contracts, and the existence of major year-round orchestras in more American cities have reduced the importance of the prestige that was once associated with the Big Five.
The New York Times suggested that "climate and cost of living are as likely to figure in a musician's choice of employer as an orchestra's historic renown." Additionally, the availability of a large number of talented young musicians is described as a "leveling factor" that enhances the quality of all American orchestras. ==See also==