The established method for the production of synthetic peptides is known as solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS). SPPS allows facile assembly of a target peptide by stepwise addition of amino acids while the growing peptide chain is attached to a macroscopically insoluble solvent-swollen beaded resin support.
Characteristics of solid supports The solid support consists of small (~50-to-100 micron diameter), polymeric resin beads functionalized with reactive groups (such as amine or hydroxyl groups) that can be used to link the nascent peptide chain to the resin polymer. • The N-alpha amine of the C-terminal amino acid of the target peptide is protected with Fmoc or Boc group • Protected amino acid is coupled with free amino groups attached to resin beads • Protecting group is removed (see:
Protecting groups schemes) • The second amino acid with an
N-protecting group is coupled with the first one. Coupling reagents facilitate peptide bond formation. • The above cycle is repeated until the desired sequence has been synthesized • Optionally, the
N-terminal amino group undergoes capping, thereby preventing residual unreacted resin-bound peptides from further reaction • The crude product is purified using either: •
reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) •
multicolumn countercurrent solvent gradient purification (MCSGP) which is utilised mainly in the case of longer peptides, due to accumulation of numerous minor byproducts that have similar properties to the desired peptide product. This process is used to maximise the yield without sacrificing purity. SPPS is limited by
reaction yields due to the exponential accumulation of by-products, and typically peptides and proteins in the range of 40 or 50 amino acid residues are pushing the limits of synthetic accessibility of SPPS products as homogeneous molecules of defined chemical structure. are difficult to make. Longer peptides can be accessed by using approaches such as
native chemical ligation, where two unprotected synthetic peptides can be covalently condensed in aqueous solution.
Amino acid coupling reagents An important feature that has enabled the broad application of SPPS is the generation of extremely high yields in the coupling step. In attempts to maximize coupling yields, often a large excess of each amino acid (between 2- and 10-fold) is used in each SPPS
coupling reaction. The minimization of amino acid
racemization during coupling is also of vital importance to avoid
epimerization in the final peptide product. Amide bond formation between an amine and carboxylic acid requires 'coupling reagents' to activate the carboxyl group of the N-alpha protected amino acid reactant. A wide range of coupling reagents exist, due in part to their varying effectiveness for particular couplings, many of these reagents are commercially available.
Carbodiimides bond formation using DIC/HOBt. DIC is particularly useful for SPPS since as a liquid it is easily dispensed, and the
urea byproduct is easily washed away. Conversely, the related carbodiimide
1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) is often used for solution-phase peptide couplings as its urea byproduct can be removed by washing during aqueous
work-up.
Ethyl cyanohydroxyiminoacetate (Oxyma), an additive for carbodiimide coupling, acts as an alternative to HOAt.
Amidinium and phosphonium salts To avoid epimerization through the O-acylisourea intermediate formed when using a carbodiimide reagent, an
amidinium- or
phosphonium-reagent can be employed These reagents have two parts: an electrophilic moiety which deoxygenates the carboxylic acid (
blue) and masked nucleophilic moiety (
red). Nucleophilic attack of the carboxylic acid on the electrophilic amidinium or phosphonium moiety leads to a short lived intermediate which is rapidly trapped by the unmasked nucleophile to form the activated ester intermediate and either a
urea or
phosphoramide by-product. These cationic reagents have non-coordinating counteranions such as a
hexafluorophosphate or a
tetrafluoroborate. Phosphonium reagents include
BOP (HOBt),
PyBOP (HOBt) and
PyAOP (HOAt). Although these reagents can lead to the same activated ester intermediates as a carbodiimide reagent, the rate of activation is higher due to the high electrophilicity of these cationic reagents. Amidinium reagents are capable of reacting with the peptide N-terminus to form an inactive
guanidino by-product, whereas phosphonium reagents are not.
Propanephosphonic acid anhydride Since late 2000s,
propanephosphonic acid anhydride, sold commercially under various names such as "T3P", has become a useful reagent for amide bond formation in commercial applications. It converts the oxygen of the carboxylic acid into a leaving group, whose peptide-coupling byproducts are water-soluble and can be easily washed away. In a performance comparison between propanephosphonic acid anhydride and other peptide coupling reagents for the preparation of a nonapeptide drug, it was found that this reagent was superior to other reagents with regards to yield and low epimerization.
Solid supports Solid supports for peptide synthesis are selected for physical stability, to permit the rapid filtration of liquids. Suitable supports are inert to reagents and solvents used during SPPS and allow for the attachment of the first amino acid. Swelling is of great importance because peptide synthesis takes place within the solvent-swollen resin beads. The primary type of solid supports is suspension polymerized copoly(1% m-divinyl + styrene)beaded resin. Two primary resins are used, based on whether a C-terminal carboxylic acid or amide is desired. The Wang resin was, , the most commonly used resin for peptides with C-terminal carboxylic acids.
Protecting groups schemes As described above, the use of N-terminal and side chain
protecting groups is essential during peptide synthesis to avoid undesirable side reactions, such as self-coupling of the activated amino acid leading to (
polymerization). with side chain protection and a resin linkage that are acid-labile (final acidic cleavage is carried out via TFA treatment). Both approaches, including the advantages and disadvantages of each, are outlined in more detail below.
Boc/Bzl SPPS Before the advent of SPPS, solution methods for chemical peptide synthesis relied on
tert-butyloxycarbonyl (abbreviated 'Boc') as a temporary N-terminal α-amino protecting group. The Boc group is removed with acid, such as
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). This forms a positively charged amino group in the presence of excess TFA (note that the amino group is not protonated in the image on the right), which is neutralized and coupled to the incoming activated amino acid. Neutralization can either occur prior to coupling or
in situ during the basic coupling reaction. The Boc/Bzl approach retains its usefulness in reducing peptide
aggregation during synthesis. In addition, Boc/benzyl SPPS may be preferred over the Fmoc/
tert-butyl approach when synthesizing peptides containing base-sensitive moieties (such as
depsipeptides or thioester moeities), as treatment with base is required during the Fmoc deprotection step (see below). Permanent side-chain protecting groups used during Boc/benzyl SPPS are typically benzyl or benzyl-based groups. The use of N-terminal
Fmoc deprotection scheme is truly orthogonal under SPPS conditions. Fmoc deprotection is a base-catalyzed elimination reaction that typically uses 20–50%
piperidine in
DMF. The resulting crude peptide is obtained as a TFA salt, which is potentially more difficult to solubilize than the fluoride salts generated in Boc SPPS. Fmoc/
tBu SPPS is less
atom-economical, as the fluorenyl group has a much higher mass than the Boc group. Furthermore, prices for Fmoc amino acids were high until the large-scale piloting of one of the first synthesized peptide drugs,
enfuvirtide, began in the 1990s, when market demand adjusted the relative prices of Fmoc- vs Boc- amino acids.
Other protecting groups Benzyloxy-carbonyl The (Z) group is another carbamate-type amine protecting group, discovered by
Leonidas Zervas in the early 1930s and usually added via reaction with
benzyl chloroformate. It is removed under harsh conditions using
HBr in
acetic acid, or milder conditions of catalytic
hydrogenation. This methodology was first used in the synthesis of oligopeptides by Zervas and
Max Bergmann in 1932. Hence, this became known as the Bergmann-Zervas synthesis, which was characterized "epoch-making" and helped establish synthetic peptide chemistry as a distinct field. For special applications like synthetic steps involving
protein microarrays, protecting groups sometimes termed "lithographic" are used, which are amenable to
photochemistry at a particular wavelength of light, and so which can be removed during
lithographic types of operations.
Regioselective disulfide bond formation The formation of multiple native disulfides remains challenging for native peptide synthesis by solid-phase methods. Random chain combination typically results in several products with nonnative disulfide bonds. Stepwise formation of disulfide bonds is typically the preferred method, and performed with thiol protecting groups. Different thiol protecting groups provide multiple dimensions of orthogonal protection. These orthogonally protected cysteines are incorporated during the solid-phase synthesis of the peptide. Successive removal of these groups, to allow for selective exposure of free thiol groups, leads to disulfide formation in a stepwise manner. The order of removal of the groups must be considered so that only one group is removed at a time. Thiol protecting groups used in peptide synthesis requiring later regioselective disulfide bond formation must possess multiple characteristics. First, they must be reversible with conditions that do not affect the unprotected side chains. Second, the protecting group must be able to withstand the conditions of solid-phase synthesis. Third, the removal of the thiol protecting group must be such that it leaves intact other thiol protecting groups, if orthogonal protection is desired. That is, the removal of PG A should not affect PG B. Some of the thiol protecting groups commonly used include the acetamidomethyl (Acm),
tert-butyl (But), 3-nitro-2-pyridine sulfenyl (NPYS), 2-pyridine-sulfenyl (Pyr), and
trityl (Trt) groups. Using this method, Kiso and coworkers reported the first total synthesis of insulin in 1993. In this work, the A-chain of insulin was prepared with following protecting groups in place on its cysteines: CysA6(But), CysA7(Acm), and CysA11(But), leaving CysA20 unprotected. ==Microwave-assisted peptide synthesis==