Assembly SNARE proteins must assemble into
trans-SNARE complexes to provide the force that is necessary for
vesicle fusion. The four
α-helix domains (1 each from
synaptobrevin and
syntaxin, and 2 from
SNAP-25) come together to form a
coiled-coil motif. The
rate-limiting step in the assembly process is the association of the syntaxin SNARE domain, since it is usually found in a "closed" state where it is incapable of interacting with other SNARE proteins. When syntaxin is in an open state,
trans-SNARE complex formation begins with the association of the four SNARE domains at their
N-termini. The SNARE domains proceed in forming a coiled-coil motif in the direction of the
C-termini of their respective domains.
SNAP and
NSF also associate with the complex formed by SNAREs during this step and participate in the later events of priming and disassembly. The SM protein
Munc18 is thought to play a role in assembly of the SNARE complex, although the exact mechanism by which it acts is still under debate. It is known that the clasp of Munc18 locks syntaxin in a closed conformation by binding to its
α-helical SNARE domains, which inhibits syntaxin from entering SNARE complexes (thereby inhibiting
fusion). This possible mechanism of dissociation and subsequent re-association with the SNARE domains could be calcium-dependent. This supports the idea that Munc18 plays a key regulatory role in
vesicle fusion; under normal conditions the SNARE complex will be prevented from forming by Munc18, but when triggered the Munc18 will actually assist in SNARE-complex assembly and thereby act as a fusion
catalyst. When the
trans-SNARE complex is formed, the SNARE proteins are still found on opposing membranes. As the SNARE domains continue coiling in a
spontaneous process, they form a much tighter, more stable four-helix bundle. During this "zippering" of the SNARE complex, a fraction of the released energy from binding is thought to be stored as molecular bending stress in the individual SNARE motifs. This mechanical stress is postulated to be stored in the semi-rigid linker regions between the transmembrane domains and the SNARE helical bundle. The energetically unfavorable bending is minimized when the complex moves peripherally to the site of membrane fusion. As a result, relief of the stress overcomes the repulsive forces between the
vesicle and the
cell membrane and presses the two membranes together. Several models to explain the subsequent step – the formation of stalk and fusion pore – have been proposed. However, the exact nature of these processes remains debated. In accordance with the "zipper" hypothesis, as the SNARE complex forms, the tightening helix bundle puts torsional force on the
transmembrane (TM) domains of
synaptobrevin and
syntaxin. This causes the TM domains to tilt within the separate membranes as the proteins coil more tightly. The unstable configuration of the TM domains eventually causes the two membranes to fuse and the SNARE proteins come together within the same membrane, which is referred to as a "
cis"-SNARE complex. As a result of the lipid rearrangement, a
fusion pore opens and allows the chemical contents of the
vesicle to leak into the outside environment. The continuum explanation of stalk formation suggests that membrane fusion begins with an infinitesimal radius until it radially expands into a stalk-like structure. However, such a description fails to take into account the molecular dynamics of membrane lipids. Recent molecular simulations show that the close proximity of the membranes allows the lipids to splay, where a population of lipids insert their hydrophobic tails into the neighboring membrane – effectively keeping a "foot" in each membrane. The resolution of the splayed lipid state proceeds spontaneously to form the stalk structure. In this molecular view, the splayed-lipid intermediate state is the rate determining barrier rather than the formation of the stalk, which now becomes the free energy minimum. The energetic barrier for establishment of the splayed-lipid conformation is directly proportional to the intermembrane distance. The SNARE complexes and their pressing of the two membranes together, therefore, could provide the free energy required to overcome the barrier.
Disassembly The energy input that is required for SNARE-mediated fusion to take place comes from SNARE-complex disassembly. The suspected energy source is
N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF), an
ATPase that is involved with
membrane fusion. NSF homohexamers, along with the NSF
cofactor α-SNAP, bind and dissociate the SNARE complex by coupling the process with
ATP hydrolysis. This process allows for reuptake of
synaptobrevin for further use in
vesicles, whereas the other SNARE proteins remain associated with the
cell membrane. The dissociated SNARE proteins have a higher energy state than the more stable
cis-SNARE complex. It is believed that the energy that drives
fusion is derived from the transition to a lower energy
cis-SNARE complex. The ATP hydrolysis-coupled dissociation of SNARE complexes is an energy investment that can be compared to "cocking the gun" so that, once
vesicle fusion is triggered, the process takes place
spontaneously and at optimum velocity. A comparable process takes place in muscles, in which the myosin heads must first hydrolyze
ATP in order to adapt the necessary conformation for interaction with actin and the subsequent power stroke to occur. ==Regulatory effects on exocytosis==