in Germany, where
Annals 1–6 were discovered. Voltaire was generally critical of Tacitus and said that Tacitus did not comply with the standards for providing a historical background to civilization. In 1878, John Wilson Ross and, in 1890, Polydore Hochart suggested that the whole of the
Annals had been forged by the Italian scholar
Poggio Bracciolini (1380–1459). Voorst, however, does not address any of Ross' objections regarding numerous purported historical inaccuracies in the
Annals, but only faults Hochart on a few points in a footnote. The
provenance of the manuscripts containing the
Annals goes back to the
Renaissance. While Bracciolini had discovered three minor works at
Hersfeld Abbey in Germany in 1425,
Zanobi da Strada (who died in 1361) had probably earlier discovered
Annals 11–16 at Monte Cassino where he lived for some time. Regardless of whether the Monte Cassino manuscripts were moved to Florence by Boccaccio or da Strada, Boccaccio made use of the
Annals when he wrote
Commento di Dante c. 1374 (before the birth of Poggio Bracciolini), giving an account of
Seneca's death directly based on the Tacitean account in
Annals book 15. Francis Newton states that it is likely that
Annals 11–16 were in
Monte Cassino during the first half of the rule of Abbot Desiderius (1058–1087) who later became
Pope Victor III.
Annals 1–6 were then independently discovered at
Corvey Abbey in Germany in 1508 by
Giovanni Angelo Arcimboldi, afterwards Archbishop of Milan, and were first published in Rome in 1515 by
Beroaldus, by order of Pope
Leo X, who afterwards deposited the manuscript in the
Medicean Library in Florence.
Content ==In popular culture==