MarketTarski's theorem about choice
Company Profile

Tarski's theorem about choice

In mathematics, Tarski's theorem, proved by Alfred Tarski, states that in ZF the statement "For every infinite set , there is a bijective map between the sets and " implies the axiom of choice. The opposite direction was already known, thus the statement and axiom of choice are equivalent.

Proof
The goal is to prove that the axiom of choice is implied by the statement "for every infinite set A: |A| = |A \times A|". It is known that the well-ordering theorem is equivalent to the axiom of choice; thus it is enough to show that the statement implies that for every set B there exists a well-order. Since the collection of all ordinals such that there exists a surjective function from B to the ordinal is a set, there exists an infinite ordinal, \beta, such that there is no surjective function from B to \beta. We assume without loss of generality that the sets B and \beta are disjoint. By the initial assumption, |B \cup \beta| = |(B \cup \beta) \times (B \cup \beta)|, thus there exists a bijection f : B \cup \beta \to (B \cup \beta) \times (B \cup \beta). For every x \in B, it is impossible that \beta \times \{x\} \subseteq f[B], because otherwise we could define a surjective function from B to \beta. Therefore, there exists at least one ordinal \gamma \in \beta such that f(\gamma) \in \beta \times \{x\}, so the set S_x = \{\gamma : f(\gamma) \in \beta \times \{x\}\} is not empty. We can define a new function: g(x) = \min S_x. This function is well defined since S_x is a non-empty set of ordinals, and so has a minimum. For every x, y \in B, x \neq y the sets S_x and S_y are disjoint. Therefore, we can define a well order on B, for every x, y \in B we define x \leq y \iff g(x) \leq g(y), since the image of g, that is, g[B] is a set of ordinals and therefore well ordered. ==References==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com