The exhibition had a distinctly varied and even quite harsh critical reception.
The Philadelphia Inquirer called the series "Jewploitation" and a critic for
The Village Voice wrote that the show was "hypocritical, cynical and exploitative." Roger Hurlburt of the
Fort Lauderdale News praised Warhol's approach: "Warhol's highly graphic technique masterfully singles out those traits that emphasize a universal aspect for each personality. … The image may be immediately recognizable, but Warhol forces us to evaluate the work while he remains distant."
Subsequent assessments In 2006, the National Portrait Gallery wrote that "Warhol's insistence that the subjects be deceased invests the series with an inescapable character of mortality. The faces of the dead appear as if behind a veneer of modernity. The tension sustained between photograph and abstraction focuses the issue of their celebrity. Probing the faultlines between the person and their manufactured, surface image, Warhol presents these individuals' fame as a complex metamorphosis". In 2008, Ken Johnson of
The New York Times wrote that "What is remarkable about the paintings now, however, is how uninteresting they are. What once made them controversial – the hint of a jokey, unconscious anti-Semitism – has evaporated, leaving little more than bland, posterlike representations. The paintings do have a certain visual panache; you could even call some of them jazzy. … The issue for Warhol is not what his subjects did and not Jewishness in general. His real subject was fame. He was interested in famous people simply because they were famous". ==References==