Preterism symbolizing the sun
Preterism is a
Christian eschatological view that interprets
prophecies of the Bible, especially the Books of Daniel and Revelation, by reference to events that had already happened. Preterist academic scholars generally identify the first beast from the sea with the
Roman Empire, particularly with Emperor
Nero. The beast from the earth is generally identified with the
Roman imperial cult. Sometimes there is a particular identification with a personage such as a chief administrator of Roman rule in
Ephesus and
Asia Minor. This is probably the provincial governor (or
proconsul) who would have overseen the political and religious operations of the area from his capital in Ephesus (Ephesus is the location of one of the
Seven Churches in Asia to whom the Book of Revelation was addressed.) This interpretation is based upon the angel's explanation of the beast in , that the beast's seven heads are seven kings () and that Nero, is the sixth king "who is", who was possibly alive and the emperor reigning at the time John was writing the book. The five kings who have fallen are seen as
Julius,
Augustus,
Tiberius,
Caligula and
Claudius;
Galba is the one who "has not yet come, but when he does come, he must remain for a little while". (). Moreover, Rome was known in antiquity as the city of
seven hills () and Revelation was a warning about events that were "shortly" to take place (
Revelation 1:1). In , the beast was given a mouth speaking in blasphemies against
God and his name. Inscriptions have been found in Ephesus in which Nero is called "Almighty God" and "Savior". In verse 4, the beast is worshiped by the world alongside the dragon that gave it authority. Nero and
Caligula "abandoned all reserve" in promoting emperor worship—they were the only two who demanded divine honors while still alive. Nero claimed to be the sun-god
Apollo. speaks of the power given to the beast to make war with the
saints. Nero was the first of the imperial authorities to persecute
Christianity.
Tacitus records the scene in
Rome when the
persecution of Christians (or Chrestians) broke out: "And their death was aggravated with mockeries, insomuch that, wrapped in the hides of wild beasts, they were torn to pieces by dogs, or fastened to crosses to be set on fire, that when the darkness fell they might be burned to illuminate the night."
Revelation 13:5 says that the beast would continue for 42 months. The Neronic persecution was instituted in AD 64 and lasted until his death in June AD 68, which is three and a half years, or 42 months. Nero was even called
the beast.
Apollonius of Tyana specifically states that Nero was called a beast: The manner of Nero's death corresponds with the prophecy of : "If anyone is destined for captivity, to captivity he goes; if any one kills with the sword, with the sword he must be killed." According to
Tertullian, Nero was the first to assail the Christian sect with the imperial sword. He committed
suicide by the sword at age 30. After Nero's death in AD 68, Rome saw a quick succession of short-lived emperors (
Galba,
Otho, and
Vitellius) and a year of
civil wars until
Vespasian eventually took control in AD 69. The Roman Empire destabilized so greatly that
Tacitus reported: "Many believed the end of the empire was at hand". According to
Suetonius, to the surprise of the world, "the empire which for a long time had been unsettled and, as it were, drifting through the usurpation and violent death of three emperors, was at last taken in and given stability by the
Flavian family". This may be a reference to the mortal wound on one of the heads of the beast "inflicted by the sword" which was later healed (, ). D. K. Wong (2003) wrote that the "healing of the wound" alludes to the so-called
Nero Redivivus legend ("revival of Nero" myth). A rumour said that Nero had just disappeared to
Parthia, and would one day reappear. Finally, the readers of Revelation were told to
"calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six" (Rev. 13:18). John did not expect his readers
"who had understanding" to have any difficulty identifying the beast, since they could simply calculate the meaning of this number:
"Neron Kaisar" ( the
Greek rendering, documented by
archaeological finds), transliterated into
Hebrew (Nrwn Qsr). When using standard
mispar hechrechi encoding of
gematria, adding the corresponding values yields 666, as shown: The variant number 616 found in some manuscripts of the Greek text of Revelation may represent the alternative Hebrew spelling (Nrw Qsr) based on the
Latin form "Nero Caesar". The variant probably existed to keep consistent the meaning of Nero as the beast.
Historicism from
Luther's translation of the New Testament from 1522. Historicism is a method of interpretation in
Christian eschatology which interprets
biblical prophecies as actual historical events and identifies symbolic beings with historical persons or societies in the history of the church. This interpretation was favored by the Protestant reformers such as
John Wycliff,
John Calvin, and
Martin Luther, as well as other prominent figures such as
Isaac Newton. According to this interpretation, the beast and false prophet were most commonly identified with
the papacy in its political and religious aspects. The identification with the papacy is a viewpoint echoed by Seventh-day Adventist writers. According to the
Seventh-day Adventist Church, the "image to the beast" represents Protestant churches which will form an alliance with the papacy, and the "mark of the beast" refers to a future universal Sunday law. Adventists have interpreted the number of the beast, 666, as corresponding to a Latin title
Vicarius Filii Dei of the
pope. The number 666 is calculated by using a form of
gematria where only the letters which refer to Latin numerals are counted. In 1866,
Uriah Smith was the first to propose the interpretation to the Seventh-day Adventist Church. In
The United States in the Light of Prophecy he wrote, Adventist scholar
J. N. Andrews also adopted this view. Uriah Smith maintained his interpretation in the various editions of
Thoughts on Daniel and the Revelation, which was influential in the church. The beast from the earth has also been interpreted as the Islamic prophet
Muhammed, according to some medieval Christians, particularly
Pope Innocent III;
Saracens and
Antipopes, according to other medieval Christians, particularly
Joachim of Fiore; and the government of the United States of America (this is the view of the Seventh-day Adventist Church). This interpretation was introduced by Adventist pioneer
John Nevins Andrews.
Samuele Bacchiocchi, an Adventist scholar, has noted that Seventh-day Adventist teaching is moving away from historicism towards a more symbolic interpretation of the mark of the beast. The Historicist interpretation has fallen out of favor with modern commentaries on Revelation, partially because it has failed to form a consensus on how the outline of the book of Revelation corresponds with history.
Idealism Idealism, also known as the
allegorical or
symbolic approach, is an interpretation of the book of Revelation that sees the imagery of the book as non-literal
symbols. This is a common viewpoint of modern Christian scholars such as
Gregory Beale in his
New International Greek Testament Commentary on the Book of Revelation. Some Idealist interpretations identify none of the book's symbols with particular historical events while some idealists like Beale take a more eclectic approach which see that the book portrays events throughout history while also predicting some future events such as the return of Christ. In this view, the beast from the sea is interpreted as the state or any human kingdom that is in opposition to God. This would include the Roman Empire but would broadly apply to all empires. Scholars take their cue from the parallels between
Revelation 13 and
Daniel 7, noting that in Daniel 7:17 that the beasts are revealed as kingdoms. Therefore, given that the beast of Revelation 13 is a composite of the beasts of Daniel, one should similarly interpret this beast as a kingdom, more specifically a composite of all kingdoms. Similarly, in some idealist circles, it is suggested that the beast represents different social injustices, such as
exploitation of workers, wealth, the elite, commerce, materialism, and imperialism. Various
Christian anarchists, such as
Jacques Ellul, have associated the
State and
political power as the beast. The Idealist interpretation of the beast from the earth is that it represents religious, cultural and economic powers within society which work to compel people to give their allegiance to the state or governmental powers. This was first expressed in the imperial cult of Rome but finds expression at all times of history. In his commentary, Michael Wilcock says "Religion, indeed is too narrow an identification of the second beast. He is, in modern parlance, the ideology – whether religious, philosophical, or political which 'gives breath to' any human social structure organized independently of God." The Idealist perspective on the number of the beast rejects gematria, envisioning the number not as a code to be broken, but a symbol to be understood. Because there are so many names that can come to 666 and that most systems require converting names to other languages or adding titles when convenient, there is no consensus. Given that numbers are used figuratively throughout the book of Revelation, idealists interpret this number figuratively as well. The common suggestion is that because seven is a number of completeness and is associated with the divine, that six is incomplete and the three sixes mean completely incomplete. Other scholars focus not on incompleteness but on the beast's ability to imitate perfection, that is, to appear authentic. Since the number six is one short of the perfect number seven, the beast's number bears "most of the hallmarks of truth, and so it can easily deceive". The Idealist interpretation in which the beast finds expression in the socio-cultural, economic and political arena of all human activities since the existence of man best describes the scriptural perspective of the beast. This position was annunciated by Chike Udolisa is his book. In this perspective, the image of the four kingdoms that were to rule the world as shown to Nebuchadnezzar were equated to the four beasts revealed to Daniel, and to the seven-headed beast revealed to John. The records of and show this beast to represent the kings of the earth. Furthermore, the revelation in Daniel 7 of four beasts comprising a lion, bear and leopard also correlates with the seven-headed beast as shown to John in having the same features of the lion, bear and leopard. Thus the beast represents the kingdoms that will bear rule over the world from Adam until the second coming of Christ. While in the spirit, this beast is seen as a personality as in Revelation 19:20, in the physical he is represented at different ages throughout the period of human existence as different kingdoms. The importance of this interpretation is that as the
Whore of Babylon is seen to be riding this beast, the beast is the seat of operation of the whore from where she is expressed, and by whom her dominion is exercised. This corresponds to Revelation 13 where the power exercised by this beast was completely that of the dragon. This brings to light the scriptural fact that the governments of the nations are puppets in the hands of this beast, consistent with the truth that the whole world system is under the dragon, the god of this world. St.
Augustine of Hippo takes a more Idealist interpretation when he writes:
Futurism Futurism is a
Christian eschatological view that interprets portions of the
Book of Revelation and the
Book of Daniel as future events in a literal, physical,
apocalyptic, and global context. This viewpoint is adopted by
Dispensationalism and has become deeply rooted in American Evangelical churches. Futurism interprets the beast from the sea to represent a revived Roman empire that will oppose Christians in the last days. Futurists would admit the symbolic ties to Rome and would interpret that the recovery from the fatal head wound would refer to a revival of this empire in the last days. It is usually understood that this revived empire will be ruled by the
Antichrist, though some refer to the beast as the Antichrist. Futurist scholars, such as
John Walvoord, identify this beast not as the individual ruler but as the revived Roman empire, noting that the reference to Rome's seven hills and the connection to the beasts in Daniel seven indicate that the beast represents a kingdom. Futurism interprets the beast from the earth, or false prophet, as the future head of the apostate church or as a future expression of false religion in general. Interpretation of the mark or number of the beast is similar to the idealist view suggesting that the number six refers to imperfection, falling short of the divine number seven.
Alternative views • The
Bahá'í Faith identifies the Beast to be the
Umayyad Caliphate, who waged spiritual war against the "
two witnesses," understood to be
Muhammad, the founder of Islam, and
Ali. •
Aleister Crowley claimed that he was the Beast prophesied in Revelation and used the name (
To Méga Thēríon, sometimes shortened to just
Therion), Greek for "The Great Beast", which adds up to 666 by
isopsephy, the Greek form of
gematria. • During the
New Deal, some ministers identified the
Congress of Industrial Organizations as a "Sign of the Beast". Outside of
black churches, 20th-century evangelicalism in America tended to regard labor unions as the mark of the beast, although evangelicals originally worked to eliminate class distinctions. • Some identify the Beast with a
supercomputer in
Brussels, Belgium. However, author Joe Musser attributes the origin of this
urban legend to his 1970 novel
Behold, a Pale Horse and to an ad campaign promoting the movie
The Rapture which featured the Brussels-based supercomputer. This ad campaign consisted of make-believe newspapers containing "reports" on various aspects of the movie. Musser speculates that stories subsequently run in an unnamed Pennsylvania newspaper and a 1976 issue of
Christian Life magazine were mistakenly based on these ads. ==See also==