Critical reception In a review for
PopMatters, music critic Tim O'Neil called the song "an odd track" that sounded like nothing he'd heard before. He continued: "I wouldn't be surprised if it was the next single [after "Galvanize"], because its [
sic] not the kind of track you forget." Jack Smith of
BBC Music described the song as "cutting edge" and "hook-laden", also highlighted it as "a welcome return" for Burgess. However,
The Guardians review by Alexis Petridis was very negative. He criticised Burgess' vocal styling as "the Awful
Falsetto", saying that "not even a mass of special effects can stop Burgess' shortcomings shining through", and calling the track one of the album's new ideas that "flop[ped]". Similarly, Matt D'Cruz of
Drowned in Sound also criticised Burgess' "strained" vocal, calling it "a poor fit for the Chems' stuttering rave pianos and ponderous beats". Scott Plagenhoef of
Pitchfork Media remarked on the "unremarkable verses and nasally vocals", although the song, along with "Galvanize", reminded him of the duo's "early B-Boy/techno days". He felt both songs were missing the ferocity and
sub-bass rattlings of their "earlier cousins". The latter song was also said by Plagenhoef to be "far better".
Chart performance In the United Kingdom, the duo's home country, the song entered the
UK Singles Chart at its peak, number 41, in the week ending 23 July 2005. It was their first single not to chart in the
top 40. It dropped to number 65 in its second week and moved to number 90 for a week before disappearing from the chart. "The Boxer" made its debut at number 36 on the
Irish Singles Chart in the week ending of 14 July before dropping to number 44 in its final week. It had a one-week stay on the
Spanish Albums Chart at number 17 in the week of 31 July, and at number 15 on
Billboards US
Hot Dance Singles Sales chart in the 30 July issue. ==Music video==