Cannes reception The film was entered into the
2003 Cannes Film Festival. It was reportedly heckled as the film began, with the crowd jeering every time Gallo's name appeared during the credits. Upon ending, Gallo stated that the film also received a 15-minute standing ovation. Sevigny's publicist, Amanda Horton, also stated that the film was applauded for 10 minutes. Paraphrasing a statement attributed to
Winston Churchill, Ebert responded with, "It is true that I am fat, but one day I will be thin, and he will still be the director of
The Brown Bunny." Gallo then claimed to have put a
hex on Ebert's
colon, cursing the critic with
cancer. In response, Ebert quipped that watching a video of his
colonoscopy had been more entertaining than watching
The Brown Bunny. Gallo subsequently stated that the hex had actually been placed on Ebert's
prostate and that he had intended the comment to be a joke which was mistakenly taken seriously by a journalist. He also conceded to finding Ebert's colonoscopy comment to be an amusing comeback. A shorter, re-edited version of the film played later in 2003 at the
Toronto International Film Festival (although it still retained the controversial sex scene). The new version was regarded more highly by some, even Ebert, who gave the new cut three stars out of a possible four. In 2004, Gallo appeared on
The Howard Stern Show, and discussed his feud with Ebert, saying they had made peace. Ebert called into the show and talked with Gallo, and the two laughed and joked about their feud. However, Gallo continued to push back on Ebert's claim that the original and re-edited versions of the film were vastly different. On the August 28, 2004, episode of the television show
Ebert & Roeper, Ebert gave the new version of the film a "thumbs up" rating. In a column published about the same time, Ebert reported that he and Gallo had made peace. According to Ebert: In 2018 (five years after Ebert's death), however, Gallo once again rebuked Ebert's statement, calling it "both far-fetched and an outright lie." According to Gallo, "If you didn't like the unfinished film at Cannes, you didn't like the finished film, and vice versa." Gallo went on to speculate that Ebert wanted to distance himself from "a brutal, dismissive review of a film that other, more serious critics eventually felt differently about." In addition, Gallo incorrectly claimed, contrary to media reports, that the film's final cut was only eight minutes shorter than the Cannes cut, not 26 minutes shorter as Ebert had noted.
Sex scene The film's sex scene, in which Sevigny performs unsimulated oral sex upon Gallo, received an overwhelmingly negative critical response at its Cannes premiere. It became a media scandal. In August 2004, upon the film's
limited theatrical release in the United States, Sevigny took to defending the film and its final scene, stating "It's a shame people write so many things when they haven't seen it. When you see the film, it makes more sense. It's an
art film. It should be playing in museums. It's like an
Andy Warhol movie." Despite the negative backlash toward Sevigny's involvement in the film, some critics praised her decision.
New York Times reviewer
Manohla Dargis said: Seven years later, in an interview for
Playboys January 2011 issue, Sevigny talked about the oral sex scene in the film: "What's happened with that is all very complicated. There are a lot of emotions. I'll probably have to go to therapy at some point. But I love Vincent. The film is tragic and beautiful, and I'm proud of it and my performance. I'm sad that people think one way of the movie, but what can you do? I've done many explicit sex scenes, but I'm not that interested in doing any more. I'm more self-aware now and wouldn't be able to be as free, so why even do it?" ==Reception==