Reviews from critics were largely negative.
Gene Siskel of the
Chicago Tribune gave the film 1.5 stars out of 4 and called it "a pretentious potboiler" with characters that have "no identity other than sex-starved or sex-threatened." He ranked it behind only
The Trial of Billy Jack on his year-end list of the worst films of 1974. Arthur D. Murphy of
Variety wrote that "Scott and associates have done a first class job in making this film. All four performances are excellent, and Scott's direction (after the '
Rage' debacle) is in complete control."
Pauline Kael of
The New Yorker wrote that the film "crawls by in slightly under two hours, but they're about as agonizing as any two hours I've ever spent at the movies ... Scott has to take the rap for his crapehanger's direction and for not knowing better than to buy this script, but the scriptwriters, Max Ehrlich and Frank De Felitta, really ought to have their names inscribed in a special hall of infamy."
Tom Milne of
The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote, "The performances are sound enough, but it is difficult to feel much conviction when Trish Van Devere sports the same daintily besmirched white nightie throughout the eighteen odd years covered by the action, and when the jungle boy still moves and talks like a sullen Californian beach bum."
Leonard Maltin's film guide gave its lowest rating of BOMB. == References ==