Box office The Butterfly Effect opened alongside
Win a Date with Tad Hamilton!. The film reached the top spot of the box office upon its opening weekend, grossing $17,100,000, displacing
Along Came Polly to second place. David Tuckerman of
New Line Cinema estimated that despite the film's negative reception, audiences were drawn to see Kutcher in a serious role. In its second weekend, the film placed second behind
You Got Served and grossed $9,900,000. By the end of its theatrical run in May 2004,
The Butterfly Effect earned $57,938,693 domestically and $96,693,728 worldwide. On
Metacritic, another review aggregator, it has a score of 30 out of 100 based on 35 reviews, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews". Audiences polled by
CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "B+" on an A+ to F scale.
Roger Ebert wrote that he "enjoyed
The Butterfly Effect, up to a point" and that the "plot provides a showcase for acting talent, since the actors have to play characters who go through wild swings." However, Ebert said that the scientific notion of the
butterfly effect is used inconsistently: Evan's changes should have wider reverberations. Sean Axmaker of the
Seattle Post-Intelligencer called it a "metaphysical mess", criticizing the film's mechanics for being "fuzzy at best and just plain sloppy the rest of the time". Mike Clark of
USA Today also gave the film a negative review, stating, "Normally, such a premise comes off as either intriguing or silly, but the morbid
subplots (there's
prison sex, too) prevent
Effect from becoming the unintentional howler it might otherwise be." Additionally, Ty Burr of
The Boston Globe went as far as saying, "whatever train-wreck pleasures you might locate here are spoiled by the vile acts the characters commit." Matt Soergel of
The Florida Times-Union rated it three stars out of four, writing, "
The Butterfly Effect is preposterous, feverish, creepy and stars Ashton Kutcher in a dramatic role. It's a blast... a solidly entertaining B-movie. It's even quite funny at times..."
The Miami Herald said, "
The Butterfly Effect is better than you might expect despite its awkward, slow beginning, drawing you in gradually and paying off in surprisingly effective and bittersweet ways," and added that Kutcher is "appealing and believable...
The Butterfly Effect sticks to its rules fairly well... overall the film is consistent in its flights of fancy." The
Worcester Telegram & Gazette praised it as "a disturbing film" and "the first really interesting film of 2004," adding that Kutcher "carries it off": In a retrospective,
Peter Bradshaw of
The Guardian wrote that critics, including himself, were too harsh on the film at the time of its release. Describing the film as having been patronized, Bradshaw cited critical disdain for Kutcher as making the film uncool to like.
Accolades ==Sequels and attempted reboot==