Publishers Weekly remarked that Dershowitz "bombards opponents with inflammatory charges based on sometimes tendentious readings of skimpily contextualized remarks..." It also stated that the book lacked "the judicious treatment these issues cry out for." Michael D. Langan of
The Boston Globe writes: "Dershowitz makes a compelling 'Case for Peace'...The author's advocacy skills are well-honed and incisive. In fact, one is reminded of the logical argumentation used by
Thomas Aquinas in his
Summa Theologica...: laying out basic questions for analysis, exploring arguments that appear reasonable, and concluding with an equivalent of Aquinas's famous 'I answer that ...,' which gives the 'correct' answer.
Norman Finkelstein writes that Dershowitz's book was mainly an attempt to rationalize then-PM
Ariel Sharon's "land grab" in the
West Bank, and Dershowitz rationalized that under the guise of a two-state solution. Mark Lewis, writing for
The New York Times Book Review, writes that "
The Case for Peace is faithful to the title: Dershowitz says Yasser Arafat's death makes peace possible, if the Palestinians accept a state based in Gaza and 'nearly all of the West Bank,' with a division of greater Jerusalem." Lewis further writes: ==See also==