The New York Times' July 20, 1931, review (bylined L.N.) gives the film short shrift, observing: “All of (it) is familiar to picture-goers of Westchester, and it does not ring any more true than it ever did. Constance Bennett is, of course, very pretty… and Lew Cody is good as the villainous Dick. Joel McCrea seems a bit innocent to be a Parisian art student, but likely the script called for it. Walter Walker is excellent as John's father.”
The New York Age offered a very positive review, calling Bennett's performance "matchless." While praising the performances of Bennett and McCrea
The Film Daily wrote a lukewarm review, stating that "... the story itself doesn't produce much of a dramatic punch due to lots of talk and little action." The
Reading Times praised the film, calling Bennett "superb" and the rest of the cast "excellent."
Modern Screen called the film a "lavish production" and awarded high marks to Bennett and the rest of the cast, stating: "The star and an excellent cast imbue the old tale of artists and models with an up-to-date flavor, and the problem presented is one that will ever hold popular appeal." Another favorable review was offered by
Motion Picture Daily, calling it a "sophisticated drama" and praising the performances of Bennett and McCrae, although the publication advised that the film was not suitable for children.
Photoplay called the film a "poor adaptation of Robert Chamber's best seller."
Screenland listed the film among its "Six Best Pictures of the Month" in October 1931, with Bennett's performance among the ten best.
Silver Screen magazine awarded the film a "good" rating. According to RKO records, the film turned a profit of $150,000. but
The Common Law was among the few financial successes for RKO in 1931. ==References==