Reviews of the 2018 book were generally favorable, and reflected the dissertation's influence on the field of Atlantic history. In
The Nation, historian
Manisha Sinha described the broad influence of Scott's work on American historiography, observing that the "history of the black Atlantic as it is currently known would simply not have been possible without Scott’s immense contributions". In
Public Books, Mary Caton Lingold favorably noted that Scott organized the book around historical stories and events rather than academic debates. Criticism of the book focused on its lack of updates since the dissertation was written. Writing for
The New York Review of Books,
David Bell suggested that Scott could have done additional research in French archives to expand the book's treatment of
Saint-Domingue, particularly how its residents received news from other areas. In
The Journal of American History, Ashli White similarly noted that the book did not address more recent scholarship in the field or incorporate new research or sources, but concluded that the book nevertheless "offers fresh insights with each rereading". In 2019, the
Gilder Lehrman Center for the Study of Slavery, Resistance, and Abolition gave
The Common Wind a Special Achievement Award at its annual Frederick Douglass Book Prize ceremony. Scott also received the 2019 Stone Book Award and $25,000 in prize money from the
Museum of African American History, with one prize juror describing the book as "vital for how we think about so many things". The following year, the
Caribbean Philosophical Association gave
The Common Wind its annual Frantz Fanon Outstanding Book Award. ==References==