Box office During the film's second expanded theatrical run in the fall of 1983, it grossed $215,000. Candice Russell of the
Fort Lauderdale News panned the film as "the kind of hopelessly sloppy amateurism that would be laughed right out of a beginning film class." The
Miami Heralds Bill Cosford described it as "a by-the-book splatter film, unrelieved by production values or performing skill." Patrick Taggart of the
Austin American-Statesman criticized the film's technical elements, deeming them "poorly lighted and clumsily staged...
Pranks is exploitation pure and simple, with no distinction in any technical or artistic aspect." John A. Douglas, writing for
The Grand Rapids Press, similarly described the film as being of "poor quality."
Gene Siskel picked it as one of his "Dogs of the Week" for a 1982
Sneak Previews show, declaring it to be another "women in danger" slasher film.
Modern assessment In a retrospective assessment of the film, journalist Jim Harper called the film "one of the best of the low budget eighties slashers. Even though the material is pretty derivative, the direction shows promise, and the script could have been a lot worse". Film journalist Adam Rockoff gave the film a negative assessment, calling it a "bland and uninspired slasher", adding: "
The Dorm That Dripped Blood attempts one meager stab at originality by killing off the
final girl in the film's last scene. This unnecessary, downbeat ending is actually a relief, for it signals not only an end to her annoying self-righteousness, but to the film as a whole". Critic and film historian
John Kenneth Muir has also championed the film's downbeat conclusion, writing in
Horror Films of the 1980s (2010): "Some writers have expressed the idea that
The Dorm That Dripped Blood is depressing because all heroes lose. In such a predictable subgenre, however, invention ought to be championed rather than attacked." In a retrospective for
Bloody Disgusting, Paul Lê commended the film's mood and tone, writing: "What
The Dorm That Dripped Blood lacks in general memorability it makes up for in gloominess. This film has little in the way of charismatic characters, action, or set pieces, yet the outcome is quite wretched, even by slasher standards. The so-so story goes out on a brilliantly bleak note, one that deserves more recognition in conversations about grim
Christmas horror."
The Dorm That Dripped Blood holds an approval rating of
0% on movie review aggregator website
Rotten Tomatoes, based on five critic reviews. Cavett Binion of
AllMovie qualified it as a "derivative slasher clone", awarding it 1.5 out of 5 stars.
TV Guide awarded the film 1 out of a possible 5 stars, calling it "utterly predictable and full of infuriating red herrings". Film scholar John Stanley, in
Creature Features: The Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror Movie Guide (2000), awarded the film one out of five stars. ==See also==