In a review of ''The Epicure's Lament
, Salon wrote "The Epicure’s Lament
is the result of an ambition so quixotic that you may get quite a few pages into Kate Christensen’s new novel before you decide to sign on for the duration. .. characters with voices so strong and attitudes so egregious that reading about them becomes a long, tricky balancing act between the reflexive sympathy we feel for whoever tells us a story and our suspicion that we’re dealing with a rather bad man." and concluded "The Epicure’s Lament
becomes funnier the more Hugo begins to engage with the people he purports to loathe, and the more it becomes clear he’s not quite ready to leave yet. Why an author would set herself the formidable task of creating such a creature — and then convincing us to like him — is a bit puzzling, but why look a gift horse in the mouth?" and The New York Times'' called it "readable, but it's also clever to a fault and often static." ''The Epicure's Lament
has also been reviewed by Library Journal, Booklist, January Magazine, Kirkus Reviews, and Publishers Weekly''. ==References==