, the actor who played Dericke, and one possible author of the play In 1891
F. G. Fleay attributed the play to comedian
Richard Tarlton, who is known to have played the role of Dericke; in 1910 H. Dugdale Sykes attributed it to
Samuel Rowley. In 1928
B. M. Ward suggested the extant version was based on an early court
masque written by
Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. Scot McCrea thinks this unlikely, but argues that the author was probably trying to flatter Oxford, as the role of his ancestor
Richard de Vere, 11th Earl of Oxford is exaggerated in the text. Alice-Lyle Scoufos argued that Welsh scrivener and theatrical producer
Henry Evans, who was associated with the Earl, was the most likely author. In 1944
E. M. W. Tillyard claimed the play for the young Shakespeare, followed by Seymour Pitcher in 1961. Pitcher argued that annotations to
Edward Hall's
Chronicles were probably written by Shakespeare and that these are very close to passages in the play. This view has not received much support, but because of the play's "manifest verbal flatness", it has been widely argued that the published version of the play is a
memorial reconstruction (based on memory rather than a manuscript). Just as the authorship of
Famous Victories is disputed, so too is its chronological placement in the development of the English drama. However, as published in 1598 the play is advertised as one acted by "her Queen's Majesty's Players", referring to
Queen Elizabeth's Men, a company which, while surviving into the 1590s was in deep decline by 1590. It is generally agreed that Richard Tarlton, who died in 1588, played the clown role (Dericke) in the play and that
William Knell, who died in 1587, played Henry. This is because of a record of a performance in which "Knel, then playing Henry the fift, hit Tarlton a sound boxe indeed, which made the people laugh the more". Scoufus, as mentioned, places it in around 1583; Ward argued for a date circa 1576. It is certain, however, that the play significantly antedates the canonical Shakespearean treatment of the same historical materials in
Henry IV, Part 1,
Henry IV, Part 2, and
Henry V by some years. ==References==