Critical reception The series received widespread critical praise for its cinematography, technological advances, narration, presentation, storytelling and environmental message. On
Rotten Tomatoes, the series has an approval rating of 100% based on 5 reviews. Harry Cockburn of
The Independent praised the show for bringing "an incredible level of drama, insight and imaginative presentation" to its subject matter. Carol Midgley of
The Times also gave the series five stars, saying that the series at times felt "like a horror flick" and at other times was "almost a plant porno." Anita Singh, in a review for
The Telegraph, also compared some of the show's imagery to that of
horror films, and gave the series four out of five stars. It received five-star reviews in the
Financial Times and
The Guardian.
Natalie Bennett, writing for
The House, praised the series overall, but criticized it for relying on nature documentary tropes of conflict and struggle, and not also portraying examples of
interspecies cooperation. The series was also praised for raising awareness of environmental issues and climate change. Critics commented on the environmental message of the series, which encouraged the conservation and appreciation of plant life. Steve Clarke, writing for
Variety, considered it to be an example of "a new willingness from TV types to put uncomfortable truths regarding environmental damage alongside feel-good shots of beautiful beasts and pristine landscapes." An editorial piece in
The Guardian described the series as "[taking] aim at
plant blindness" by demonstrating the importance of plant life. The series was nominated for the
Cinema for Peace International Green Film Award in 2024.
Audience response The first episode of the series received an average of 4.5 million viewers in the UK, peaking at 5.4 million. == Related exhibitions and initiatives ==