On
Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 10% based on , with a
weighted average rating of 4.1/10.
Ain't It Cool News praised
Steve Railsback's performance as Gein, and concluded, "
Ed Gein is not must-see but it's a lot better than I thought it would be. I would recommend a rental to the curious horror or
true crime fans out there looking for something sort of along the lines of
Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, but tamer, but at the same time a lot sicker."
Time Out found the film to be "a surprisingly sober response to a potentially salacious subject" and wrote, "As with the best scenes of
Deranged, the conjunction of colourful case history, odd impulses,
gallows humour, low budget austerity and genuinely grotesque
iconography produces a felicitous and engaging variant of
American Gothic." In a review written for
AllMovie,
Richard Gilliam commended the film's historical accuracy, production design, and "low-key" approach to its source material, but also found it to be lacking in style, writing, "The problem with the authenticity here is that the filmmakers have managed to authentically capture the dull, boring parts of life in 1950s rural Wisconsin.
Ed Gein is so under-the-top that what should be compelling merely becomes unpleasant."
Nathan Rabin of
The A.V. Club had a lukewarm response to the film, writing, "Half character study, half
exploitation film,
Ed Gein is most effective when it focuses on Gein's halting attempts to connect with his neighbors, who treat him with the polite but decided distance of an adult dealing with a misbehaving but well-intentioned child. Where the film falters is in its attempts to explain away Gein's madness with a massive dose of
pop psychology." While ''
The Guardian's''
Philip French offered praise to Railsback's performance as Gein, he found the film itself to be "a generally unsensational chunk of bizarre
Americana" that "adds little to our understanding of the man." Fellow
Guardian reviewer
Peter Bradshaw had a similar response to the film, writing, "Really, it's the same old
pulpy, paranoid voyeuristic stuff, and Ed's fear and hatred of women is never that edifying. It's well acted, and effectively put together, but there is an insurmountable problem: gloomy, grave-robbing, body-chopping old Ed is, in the end, just a little bit of a bore."
Kevin Thomas of the
Los Angeles Times afforded the film moderate praise, commending the performances, the atmosphere, and the historical accuracy, but went on to write, "
Ed Gein resists cheap humor in favor of moments that are inherently darkly comic, and tries for a seriousness of purpose, yet is at times awkward and under-inspired, creating a question as to whether so gloomy and repugnant a tale was worth telling simply for its own sake." Neil Smith of the
BBC called the film "gross and repellent" and awarded it a score of 2/5, writing, "Parello's stated intention is to explore the psychology of his twisted protagonist, but the result has all the hallmarks of a low-budget exploitationer, right down to its
B movie leads Steve Railsback and
Carrie Snodgress. Would it be too much to expect some thought or consideration for Gein's victims? Evidently so, given Hollywood's depressing habit of turning serial killers into cult heroes." ''
Variety's
Robert Koehler gave Ed Gein'' a wholly negative review, deriding it for being both lackluster and "a disappointingly mild re-creation of true events." Chuck Parello and Steve Railsback won Best Film and Best Actor, respectively, at the 2000
Sitges Film Festival. == See also ==