Overall critical reception The film has a 93% approval rating on
Rotten Tomatoes, based on 15 reviews. Foster's biographer Louis Chunovic referred to the film as "much maligned" in his 1995 biography on the star.
Contemporary American reviews Janet Maslin for
The New York Times wrote this was Foster's most natural portrayal of a child and that Sheen was frightening, and found the romance to be the greatest strength.
Charles Champlin of the
Los Angeles Times called it "the exact movie equivalent of one of those slim, swift novels that are read on rainy Sundays or late at night or on vacation, for their pleasurable unimportance."
Varietys review stated that the story was unbelievable, and that the romance was one of the few positive aspects.
Times Christopher Porterfield felt the film failed to address the most interesting mysteries, and that doing so, combined with Foster's acting, would have made the film memorable.
Judith Crist's review in the
New York Post judged it to be "a better-than-average thriller".
Contemporary Canadian reviews Clyde Gilmour of
The Toronto Star said that "Jodie Foster alone emerges from this wishy-washy production with her renown intact. She handles her complex role with the cool adult professionalism that is her trademark. But the character itself is thinly developed in the script and remains an enigma at the obligatory freeze-frame fadeout." Martin Malina of the
Montreal Star wrote that "this odd little adolescent love story-cum-murder mystery depends very heavily for its effectiveness on the playing of its principal character, and Miss Foster doesn't disappoint." Julie Maskoulis of
The Gazette wrote that "without her unbelievable cool and calm self-sufficiency as the unusual adolescent of the story, the film would not be nearly as penetrating. It is hard to say how much of Foster's stunning performance can be credited to director Nicolas Gessner, who brilliantly manipulates a build-up of suspense by insinuation and suggestion using Laird Koenig's screenplay (based on his novel). He spares us visually gruesome details, thus making the impact of their retelling, within the film much more forceful." Frank Daley of the
Ottawa Journal called the film "very slight" but said it "might do business in the U.S. on the strength of Foster's name." Noel Taylor of the
Ottawa Citizen called the film "a modest thriller with conventionally scarey moments", adding that "director Nicholas Gessner builds his tension gently and is decently wary of sensationalism."
Retrospective reviews Felicia Feaster of
Turner Classic Movies remarked that
The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane became a
cult film, noting
Danny Peary profiled it in his
Guide for the Film Fanatic. Peary also listed it in his book
Cult Horror Movies. In 1992,
James Monaco gave the film three and a half stars, assessing it as disturbing and complimenting the performances and writing. In their
DVD and Video Guide 2005, Mick Martin and Marsha Porter awarded it three and a half stars, commenting it was "remarkably subdued". Author David Greven praised Foster for a performance "achingly" suggesting "adolescent anomie". In his
2015 Movie Guide,
Leonard Maltin gave the film three stars, declaring it as a "Complex, unique mystery".
Accolades ==See also==