Roger Rosenblatt calls it a "clever trick" of a poem, and emphasizes how the nomenclature of the rifle parts "mimics the flowering of spring".
Susan Manning considered it to be "a studied, ironic catalogue of some parts of experience silencing others" which "excludes more than it includes", noting the presence of "the beauty of nature and its utter irrelevance to the human struggle".
Vernon Scannell observed that the poem is
contrapuntal, in that it contains the voices of both the instructor and the trainee; he also outlined a "thread of sexual innuendo" which "becomes unequivocal in the third and fourth stanzas". ==Origin==