The date of the play suggests a connection with the
King’s Great Matter, and Jupiter has been seen as analogous to Henry VIII. As the Great Matter was linked to the
English Reformation which would ultimately create Henry as the Supreme Head of the
Church of England and make him responsible for the temporal and spiritual welfare of his subjects, the play has been interpreted as a rehearsal of some of the new responsibilities Henry would undertake. While it is represented as prudent for a ruler to listen to the counsel and needs of his subjects, the play also depicts Jupiter as having the final word, and therefore looks forward to an absolutist monarchy. Greg Walker has argued that, in the face of the religious changes about to affect the country, the Catholic John Heywood is making a case for religious tolerance and moderation in the future. Noting similarities between Heywood’s Jupiter and the tyrants of the medieval
mystery plays, Candace Lines sees in the god of
The Play of the Weather a far more satirical representation of kingship than other critics of the play. In an argument which might proscribe courtly performance, she writes, “Even the play’s seemingly innocent meteorological plot contains associations with the cycle drama tyrants. In the
York cycle and the fragmentary
Coventry cycle,
Herod claims to control the weather...Jupiter’s resemblance to the York Herod is even stronger, because this Herod mingles his claim of weather-controlling prowess with an assertion of his authority over classical gods.” ==References==