Beth Spacey, in the
British Journal for Military History found the book "reward[ed] the reader with both breadth and depth", which she thought would be valuable "to specialist and non-specialist readers alike". Roberto Celestre, in ''
, was complementary of the serious attempt to present an Islamic perspective on the crusades without demonising the crusaders. Similarly, Alex Mallett, in the Bulletin of the School of Oriental & African Studies, thought it compared well to previous attempts at a study of the Islamic perspective on the conflict which where either sensationalist—such as The Crusades through Arab Eyes—or lacking the general political history—The Crusades: Islamic Perspectives''. Overall, he called it an "exceptional [...] introduction to the Muslim side of the Crusades". Stephanie Honchell, in the
Review of Middle East Studies, called it an "impressive and thought-provoking contribution to the historiography of both the Crusades and the Islamic world" and "original and innovative work". He also thought that the
periodization that Cobb proposed "promotes a shift away from
Eurocentrism". Niall Christie, in
The Historian, also called it a "an outstanding history of the Muslim experience of the Crusades". ==References==