MarketSanta Cruz Operation
Company Profile

Santa Cruz Operation

The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. was an American software company, based in Santa Cruz, California, that was best known for selling three Unix operating system variants for Intel x86 processors: Xenix, SCO UNIX, and UnixWare.

Early history
Origin SCO was founded in 1979 in Santa Cruz, California, by Larry Michels and his son Doug Michels as a computer consulting company that focused on both technology and management considerations. (Larry Michels was first cousin of another technology entrepreneur, Allen Michels. and relocated to Santa Cruz to run it remotely from there. As part of this, Michels was involved with a telephony business, TRW Vidar. This was a company, based in Mountain View, California, that TRW had acquired and that was a part of TRW Electronics. TRW Vidar was a pioneer in digital telephone switches, and also an early user of Version 6 Unix in its development environment. Michels felt that TRW as a whole did not understand the rapid change that computers were bringing to businesses or what it had with Vidar – "They thought they were buying a telephony business, they thought that telephony was telephony, but they really were computers. Unless you approached them as being computers, you didn't end up with anything." Doug Michels, 25 years old at the time, The two saw some commonalities in their consulting endeavors and decided to join forces to reduce overhead. The name came from Larry Michels' time as head of the TRW advanced research group, when the remote outpost had been known as 'the Santa Cruz operation'. Moreover, people at SCO realized that since Unix was portable and not controlled by any hardware manufacturer, use of it could allow microprocessor-based system manufacturers to avoid having to develop a proprietary operating system of their own, which they had neither the time nor the expertise to do. although Interactive Systems Corporation, which put out the first commercial Unix release (as a base for office automation systems) in 1977, perhaps has a stronger case. SCO also did a Unix port to the LSI-11 variant of the PDP-11. In doing so, Microsoft gave HCR and Logica the rights to do Xenix ports and license Xenix binaries in those territories. In 1983, SCO made a technically difficult port of Xenix to the unmapped Intel 8086 processor (earlier 8086 Xenix ports required an off-chip MMU) and licensed rights from Microsoft to be able to ship its packaged Unix system, Xenix, for the IBM PC XT. This work takes advantage of earlier porting and compilers work that Altos Computer Systems had done for the mapped 16-bit Intel architecture. SCO also sold applications for Xenix on Lisa, including a Uniplex word processor, the Multiplan spreadsheet from Microsoft, Level II COBOL from Micro Focus, and the Informix database software from Relational Database Systems. While the Lisa was not a success in the personal computer marketplace, its powerful-for-its-price-point processor combined with a relatively inexpensive operating system gave third-party vendors an attractive platform for building systems to compete with minicomputers, and SCO sold several thousand copies of Xenix for the Lisa. While some of SCO's staff had studied computer science, others were coming from backgrounds in linguistics, sociology, psychology, or business. ==Middle history==
Middle history
Growth years with Xenix on Intel In early 1984, Microsoft and SCO issued a joint announcement about SCO's rights to distribute Xenix within the United States. SCO Xenix for the PC XT shipped sometime in 1984 and contains some enhancements from 4.2BSD Unix, Micnet local area networking, and multiuser support. The product can support ten remote users via serial ports and was sold with optional packages for software development in C or assembly language and for text processing. There had been considerable skepticism in the industry that Unix could ever establish a successful market position on the PC. In December 1986, SCO acquired the Software Products Group division of Logica. It became a wholly owned subsidiary, the Santa Cruz Operation Limited, and the basis for SCO's UK operation, and then to Watford outside London. By 1993, almost half of SCO's revenues came from outside North America, and of that, almost half came from the United Kingdom. By early 1987, SCO had relocated its offices to a building at 400 Encinal Street in an industrial park in the Harvey West area of Santa Cruz (the building had been previously occupied by Intel). The company subsequently established offices in several other buildings in the Harvey West area. By early 1989, SCO had sold some 350,000 copies of Xenix in total, mostly through its channel. It later became clear that by the mid-1980s, Microsoft was losing interest in Xenix from their own business perspective, The terms of the agreement, which were not publicly disclosed, The deal put a Microsoft executive on SCO's board of directors; Already on the board since 1987 was another Microsoft veteran, Jim Harris, {{Quote box|quote=We had a very long relationship with Microsoft. We were partners, we were competitors, they invested in us, at one point they owned [around 20 percent] of the company, we licensed technology from them, we had lawsuits with them, we had every type of relationship with Microsoft you can imagine.|source=—Doug Michels, 2012. In any case, intellectual property rights were not transferred in the 1989 agreement and SCO would continue to pay Microsoft royalties for Xenix and Unix technologies. And that only came after SCO filed a complaint against Microsoft for violating European Union competition law, a complaint that was ruled valid by the European Commission. SCO UNIX and Open Desktop Needing to create a product from a more recent branch from the Unix family tree, Unix System V Release 3, SCO, together with Microsoft and Interactive Systems Corporation, worked during 1987 and 1988 to develop the System V/386 Release 3.2 version, which adds the ability to run existing Xenix binary applications on System V without requiring recompilation. The AT&T release of System V/386 Release 3.2 was announced at SCO Forum in 1988, but further work was needed by SCO to incorporate Xenix device drivers before SCO could release it as a product. SCO UNIX, full name SCO UNIX System V/386 Release 3.2.0, had first customer ship in June 1989; this became the basis for commercial successor to SCO Xenix. Based on an agreement forged with AT&T the previous year, it was also the first SCO operating system to carry the 'Unix' word itself in the product name. and Open Desktop became the first graphical Unix for an Intel 32-bit processor that was packaged in shrink-wrapped form. The TCP/IP networking stack and NFS implementation come from Lachman Associates, while Open Systems Interconnection software comes from Retix, Inc. The relational database manager included is Ingres. The Merge functionality comes from Locus Computing Corporation. Version 3.2.2 of SCO Unix and Open Desktop came out in mid-1990; it contains various fixes and improvements for problems found in the field. However, Open Desktop did not make inroads on the personal computer market, as SCO Unix's system resource requirements were strenuous and there were few commonly used PC applications available for it. Beginning in the late 1980s, AT&T and Sun Microsystems worked on a merge of Xenix, BSD, SunOS, and System V Release 3 features, with the result being known as UNIX System V Release 4. SCO acquired the Toronto, Canada-based HCR Corporation in 1990. Since their interactions in the early Xenix days, HCR had become Canada's leading commercial Unix platform developer. The HCR acquisition allowed SCO to improve its development tools offerings, especially for Open Desktop. SCO Canada took over work on the Microsoft C compiler that dates back to Xenix days but can produce binaries for either Xenix or Unix. In addition, the SCO Open Desktop Development System also offers the AT&T pcc compiler, here called rcc, but it can only compile for Unix. SCO Canada continued to sell HCR's Cfront-based C++ product, which by 1991 had an estimated 450 licensed sites using it. The Toronto site also took on some porting and integration work. SCO had a large technical publications operation at this time, with substantial staffing in each of the Santa Cruz, Toronto, and Watford offices, who as a group published on the order of 30,000 pages of documentation on a 18-month release cycle. One of the tech writers at Watford from 1991 to 1995 was science-fiction author Charles Stross, Collectively, Xenix and SCO UNIX became the most installed flavor of Unix due to the popularity of the x86 architecture. Hardware manufacturers that manufactured Intel-based systems and that resold a SCO operating system on it included not just Compaq but also DEC, Tandy Computers, Siemens Nixdorf, Olivetti, Unisys, and Hewlett-Packard. This effort produced the first version of Unix to support the symmetric multiprocessing capability of Compaq's. Applications and SCO Office Portfolio While SCO operating systems were often the basis of vertical market software offerings by others, SCO had long desired to create additional horizontal market software applications for its operating system product as part of further popularizing it. The portfolio primarily comprises SCO Lyrix, a word processor; SCO Professional, a spreadsheet; and SCO Integra, an SQL-based relational database. The first two were developed by SCO, augmented by a 4GL called Accell from Unify Corporation. Linking them together was the SCO Manager, which has a character-based but multi-windowed interface. It provides desktop tools such as mail, calendaring, and chat; an expandable menu system; and a clipboard mechanism for transmitting information between applications. Early 1990 also saw the release of Microsoft Word version 5.0 for Xenix and SCO Unix, which was also available as part of SCO Office Portfolio. It has functionality equivalent to Word for DOS, This was followed in early 1991 by Word 5.1 for SCO Unix, which has graphical user interface support. As part of adapting Word to Unix, SCO made various enhancements for multiuser support and workgroup-related features. And in mid-1990, SCO made its Word for Unix available for AT&T 3B2 and AT&T 6386 systems. This resulted in problems when, in July 1990, Lotus Development Corporation sued SCO for copyright infringement, as one of several such actions that Lotus took against its imitators and competitors. The suit was settled out of court a year later; in a victory for Lotus, SCO agreed to stop all sales and licensing of SCO Professional and instead recommend that customers use 1-2-3. In the end, SCO had neither the market share nor the sales ability to compete on applications with the major players in that area such as Microsoft and Lotus. ACE and near insolvency Besides Microsoft, venture capitalists owned about 20 percent of SCO by 1991, meaning that the Michelses owned a majority of the company, It had the goal of building the next generation commodity computing platform around the MIPS processor. Microsoft's role was to supply a version of OS/2 for the processor SCO created a top-level business unit within the company to focus on the ACE work and the expected market resulting from it. But almost from the beginning, the ACE consortium was challenged by the difficulty of large, powerful companies with disparate interests working together; one German executive from a non-member company called ACE an "eier-legende Wollmilchsau" (egg-laying woolen milk pig). By November 1991, SCO's work was reported as six months behind schedule. At the same time, indications were reported in trade media, the business press, and the general press that the ACE project as a whole was in trouble. In April 1992, a year after the start, the project fell apart; SCO publicly acknowledged that it had abandoned work on the Unix for MIPS and had withdrawn from the consortium, no longer confident that the project would succeed or was even necessary given improvements in CISC processor speed from Intel. Only some of the heavy engineering expenditures that SCO had spent on ACE were recoverable; Larry Michels said, "We learned a lot out of ACE. We learned the hard way." In 1992, Software Magazine wrote that SCO had long been "the only major player in this market," but noted that Univel and SunSoft were both introducing Unix-on-Intel products. Both of these were from better-financed companies. PC Magazine, in a lengthy review the following year of different operating system choices for the Intel architecture, wrote that SCO had a dominant position in the Unix-on-Intel market. Going public By the summer of 1992, it was clear that SCO was intending to go public in the near future, and a number of investment bankers, brokers, and analysts attended that year's SCO Forum conference with that possibility in mind. Larry Michels now viewed becoming a public company as crucial, as it would give SCO greater access to investment capital and because it would make SCO a more credible vendor to large corporations. On December 5, 1992, the San Jose Mercury News broke the story that three former executive secretaries at SCO had filed a lawsuit two days earlier against Larry Michels and SCO for sexual harassment. And asked if he regretted any of his actions, he said "I certainly regret that I hired those three girls." On December 15, a fourth-named former executive secretary joined the lawsuit, saying among other allegations that Michels had taken her to a remote wooded property he owned and tried to force himself on her and that she ran away for fear of being raped. Public attention to sexual harassment had increased following the previous year's Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill hearings, On December 21, 1992, less than three weeks after initial lawsuit was filed, Larry Michels resigned as chief executive of SCO. Harris became interim president of the company. Turndal, originally from Sweden, had overseen the large growth in SCO's European operation over the preceding six years. with the four women being awarded a total of $1.25 million. At the same time, SCO filed the necessary papers with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission to go public. Michels received a $354,000 "golden handshake" from SCO, which brought some criticism from employment rights' advocates. (Michels never returned to the company, although he kept in touch with what was going on via his son, and died of a stroke in 1999. The stock's offering price was 12 and it closed at 12, meaning that it did not have the first-day jump that "hot" IPOs are expected to show. The firm's initial stretch as a public company was difficult. Turndal further jettisoned unprofitable applications and focused on SCO's core Unix business as well as middleware additions to strengthen the platform. In December 1994, Turndal was made chair of the board as well as CEO, while Alok Mohan was elevated to president and chief operating officer. With its first release in mid-1993, Microsoft's server operating system Windows NT became a looming threat to the Unix-on-Intel market. But there were many applications available for OpenServer, By the mid-1990s, SCO Unix in all its product releases had an installed base of a million systems sold. SCO OpenServer had a foothold in the corporate world as well; the 1997 edition of the book UNIX Unleashed wrote that "It is very popular among corporate internets/intranets and has been for many years." The PizzaNet application software was developed by SCO's Professional Services group. PizzaNet was based on the first commercially licensed and bundled Internet operating system, SCO Global Access. On August 23, 1994, SCO broadcast a live music concert from the UC Santa Cruz's Cowell Courtyard. This event, part of SCO Forum 1994, is said to be the first time a scheduled live music concert was broadcast over the Internet; it was sent over both the Mbone and the emerging World Wide Web. The band was Deth Specula, a group composed of SCO employees. Their first song parodied Grand Funk Railroad's "We're an American Band". Deth Specula sang "We Are an Internet Band" with lyrics like: Everest The next big product release from the company was code-named "Everest". and software upgrades that can be run either locally or remotely. Everest was released as SCO OpenServer Release 5. The location was chosen in part to give the product an East Coast corporate veneer rather than a West Coast laid-back one. Testers of beta releases of the product, including Taco Bell which was deploying OpenServer to each of its 4,000 stores, were impressed by its reliability. Although parts of the Unix kernel were rewritten during the Everest project, One project which sought to improve OpenServer's technology base was code-named "MK2". Its origins date to 1992 with an agreement between SCO and the French company Chorus Systèmes SA for cooperative work on the Chorus microkernel technology in the context of combining OpenServer with a microkernel for use in real-time processing environments in telecommunications and other areas. The first result of this, a dual-functionality product called Chorus/Fusion for SCO Open Systems Software, was released in 1994. By 1995, SCO had set up a business unit for the MK2 venture and was spending considerable amounts of engineering resources on what was now a reimplementation of OpenServer to run on top of the Chorus microkernel, in what was going to be called the SCO Telecommunications OS Platform. A primary customer for this work was the Private Communications Systems unit within Siemens. and the goal became to run merged OpenServer/UnixWare code on top of Chorus. However, by early 1997, relations had broken down between SCO, Chorus, and the customer, and the MK2 project was scrapped without having achieved fruition. Through several changes of corporate ownership, SCO OpenServer 5 would remain a supported product into the 2020s. On July 1, 1995, Lars Turndal retired and Alok Mohan became the company's CEO. Mohan's background was in corporate finance and strategic planning with AT&T Global Information Solutions. Client Integration Division In February 1993, SCO acquired IXI Limited, a software company in Cambridge, UK, best known for its X.desktop product, which formed the graphical basis of Open Desktop. In December 1994, SCO bought Visionware, of Leeds, UK, developers of XVision. The roles of the two companies were different but complementary, as one former SCO UK employee has succinctly summarised: "IXI specialised in software that ran on Unix and made Unix easier to use. ... Visionware specialised in software that ran on Windows that made Unix easier to use." In 1995, SCO combined the two development teams to form the IXI Visionware, Ltd. subsidiary. Later in 1995, the merged business unit was subsumed more fully into its parent and became the Client Integration Division of SCO. In May 1997, the Client Integration Division released the Vision97 family of products: XVision Eclipse (a PC X server), VisionFS (an SMB server for UNIX), TermVision (a terminal emulator for Microsoft Windows), SuperVision (centralised management of users from Windows), and SQL-Retriever (ODBC- and JDBC-compliant database connectivity software). The VisionFS product was developed from scratch by the Cambridge development team; the other products were developed by the Leeds development team and were mostly new versions of the existing Visionware products. The SCO Unix channel-based sales model did not work well for the Vision products, ==Later history==
Later history
The Novell–SCO–HP deal of 1995 , the creator of C++, worked for AT&T and then USL, who made a promotional cardboard cutout figure of himself. Novell and then SCO inherited the cutout. For some time after the Novell–SCO–HP deal closed, all three companies were sharing the same office space in Florham Park, New Jersey. In order to demark which corridors were SCO's, the Stroustrup cutout was put up with a hat, a bolo tie-with-badge, and a SCO business card saying " Sheriff". Novell's 1993 acquisition of Unix System Laboratories had never really worked out, and by late summer 1995 Novell was looking for a way out of the Unix business. On September 20, 1995, Novell announced the sale of that business to SCO, coincident with a licensing arrangement with Hewlett-Packard. As part of the deal, SCO said that it would merge the SVR4.2-based UnixWare with the SVR3.2-based OpenServer, creating a new merged product code-named "Gemini". Gemini would then be sold through SCO's channel and reseller operation. Some 400 Novell software engineers had been working on UnixWare, mostly in an office in Florham Park, New Jersey; almost all of these engineers joined either SCO or HP As Doug Michels later reflected in 2006, SCO seized on the idea of buying the Unix business from Novell for three reasons: "for one, we got all the talent from Bell Labs that had created Unix; two, we got the moral authority around Unix; and three, we got rid of all the crazy historical licensing problems" dating from Unix's origins within AT&T. But little progress had been made on actual implementation, with sources for only a few components having been exchanged by the two companies. The collaboration failed for both business reasons – HP and SCO had differing perceptions of the marketplace – and technical ones – an inability to produce a common binary Unix-for-Intel product that could run existing applications from both companies' user bases. As an InformationWeek story later wrote, the three-way deal had been a "complicated plan" that was "confusing from the start".) "Gemini" and the UDK Meanwhile, SCO focused on "Gemini", the task of combining the OpenServer and UnixWare product lines on 32-bit systems. The fundamental idea behind the Gemini was that SCO could merge OpenServer 5 and UnixWare 2 in a way that would satisfy the requirements of both small businesses and large enterprises and thus keep the existing customer base that SCO had with OpenServer while entering the enterprise space with UnixWare. One consequence of the UnixWare acquisition was that the New Jersey office of Novell had a languages and development tools group with more advanced technology than what SCO Canada had been working with, including a C++ compiler based upon the Edison Design Group front-end, What the New Jersey group produced was the Universal Development Kit (UDK), The UDK featured more modern C and C++ compilers and other tools compared to what OpenServer had, and included platform-specific optimizations for things such as C++ exception handling. Over the next several years, SCO would add engineering efforts towards making Java an effective vehicle for customers to use on SCO platforms, including a mapping of Java threads onto UnixWare light-weight processes, recognition of Java class files as first-class Unix executables, as well as adapting a just-in-time compiler to the original Sun Java virtual machine. Another announced SCO effort related to Java was PerkUp, an infrastructure built on the Java classloader facility that was billed as an additional service for UnixWare 7 that would reduce the total memory and throughput needs when multiple Java server applications were running on a system (however, PerkUp never emerged as a product, and the patent for it ended up with Apple, Inc. before expiring). Initially, SCO had made a strong push for Gemini among the SCO user base; the August 1996 instance of the annual SCO Forum conference dedicated an extra two days to a series of "Gemini Fast-Track" sessions. But by a year later, SCO had decided it would not push the migration that quickly, although it still expected that within two or three years all users would migrate. One SCO executive said, "We mustn't disenfranchise the OpenServer path ... those guys [SCO resellers] are our lifeblood" and recalled that a few years earlier, SCO resellers had continued to sell Xenix-based systems even after SCO had stopped development work on Xenix. SCO referred to UnixWare 7 as being based on an SVR5 kernel, SCO committed itself to still maintaining and improving the OpenServer product for a couple of years, but made clear that it would never be expanded to 64-bit architectures. Hardware vendors already supporting UnixWare 7 included IBM, HP, Compaq, and Tandem, despite some of them offering their own Unix flavors on their high-end RISC systems. In particular, SCO had deals with IBM to sell UnixWare on the IBM Netfinity system. The funding for DCAP came from Intel and from four hardware OEM providers of Intel-based servers: Compaq, Data General, ICL, and Unisys. The features to be added to UnixWare 7 included six-way clustering and support for 16-way ccNUMA servers. A year later, at the CeBIT show in March 1999, SCO announced the release of UnixWare 7, Data Center Edition, as the product of the DCAP effort. In addition to the sponsoring companies, IBM and Sequent both said they would offer the data center edition on their servers. Another avenue towards capturing space in the enterprise was work that SCO did in conjunction with Compaq and Tandem towards the 1998 release of UnixWare NonStop Clusters. The data center release came out at the same time as UnixWare 7.1 release, which offers six different edition bundles in all. UnixWare 7.1 started seeing some strong sales. Another multi-company initiative that SCO led was the Uniform Driver Interface project (UDI), which sought to establish an OS-neutral and platform-neutral portable interface for writing device drivers. The UDI project had the backing of Intel, HP, IBM, Compaq, Sun, and others, as well as the involvement of independent hardware vendors such as Adaptec. UDI details were heavily discussed at the 1999 edition of SCO Forum; and UDI materialized in SCO operating systems with later UnixWare 7 and OpenServer 5 releases. Tarantella product October 1997 saw the first release of a new product from the Client Integration Division. Later version 1.x releases support more application types, such as AS/400 and IBM mainframe applications. At that point, the primary competitor to Tarantella became the MetaFrame product from Citrix Systems. and as a way that companies could host and outsource applications. SCO were pioneers in the notion of a web desktop, or webtop. This was also central to the idea of how Tarantella presents applications to a user. This was integrated with Tarantella to provide a UnixWare 7 webtop in 1999 which organizes access to UnixWare and its applications via any Java-enabled web browser. To some industry reviewers, the OS webtop was a compelling feature. and 1998. The company did not have good financial results during this time. During 1997 there were some reductions in staff and closing of regional offices. Michels said that he never aimed to become CEO, preferring to remain more technology-focused, but that he had always had a lot of visibility into the CEO role and was "obviously very emotionally and intellectually attached to the company" and its stakeholders. He stated that, "SCO believes electronic licensing and distribution of products will be a standard for the industry." "Monterey" During the mid- to late 1990s, many in the computer industry believed that Intel's under-development 64-bit architecture, known as IA-64 and code-named "Merced", would dominate the marketplace once released. SCO needed a well-funded hardware company to ally with; the earlier 3DA initiative with HP had failed, When IBM proposed an alliance, SCO jumped at the chance to further bolster its entry into the enterprise space. Along the way, there would be stages of earlier deliverables. This would be aided by IBM including its middleware and some AIX technology into 32-bit UnixWare, and conversely some UnixWare technology would be incorporated into future versions of AIX. Part of the motivation for Monterey was another attempt by Unix vendors to show a clear advantage for Unix in the high-end enterprise space against Microsoft's latest NT offering, now being branded as Windows 2000 and scheduled to be available for Merced as well. in part because IBM was playing catch-up in the Merced space. One SCO executive said that Monterey was "probably the biggest deal SCO has done." By October 1999, a year after the announcement, the work-in-progress Monterey was said to be up and operational on early silicon versions of Itanium, as Merced was by then officially called, and able to run both 32-bit UnixWare binaries and 64-bit natively built binaries on it. A few months later IBM released a major upgrade to AIX, but instead of it being associated with Monterey, it was called AIX 5L with the 'L' indicating an affinity for Linux. IBM's decision to shelve Monterey left the SCO product line without a 64-bit Unix solution. Itanium was further delayed, and when it did come out, it failed to succeed in the marketplace; so Project Monterey was a failure from multiple perspectives. Then in an attempt to deal with the growing popularity of Linux as a low-cost operating system, during 1999 SCO began offering consulting services for Linux. To meet the demand, SCO added more staff. The results broke a four-year streak of SCO losing money. The company also had the best cash position in its history, with some $62 million in that form or in short-term investments. The stock promptly jumped by 7 points, The increasing popularity of Linux solutions had resumed taking its toll as well. In particular, Linux posed an existential threat to SCO OpenServer's low-end marketshare; As a result, by mid-2000, SCO's market position, and the company itself, was rapidly collapsing. ==Final history==
Final history
Asset sale and change of name In March 2000, at the time of the first announced earnings shortfall, SCO had reorganized into three divisions: Server Software, Professional Services, and Tarantella. The split was intended to highlight Tarantella as a product independent of SCO Unix, On August 2, 2000, following several months of negotiations, SCO announced that it would sell its Server Software and Services Divisions, including UnixWare, to the Linux company Caldera Systems. The deal was complex, involving cash, stock, and loans, and difficult to evaluate monetarily, but based on the price of Caldera Systems stock at the time it was worth around $110–114 million. This layoff included 40 employees in Santa Cruz itself. However, the two companies' support organizations did get combined during this time. Finally on May 7, 2001, SCO completed the sale of its Server Software and Services Divisions, as well as UnixWare and OpenServer technologies, to Caldera Systems. At that time Caldera Systems changed its name to Caldera International, and the remaining part of SCO, the Tarantella Division, changed its name to Tarantella, Inc. Aftermath The sale of the company's Unix assets and renaming of what was left marked the end of an era for not just SCO but the town of Santa Cruz as well. The staff going to Caldera moved into the 400 Encinal building while the newly named Tarantella occupied the 425 Encinal structure. There were ironies in SCO's demise being largely from the effects of Linux, since SCO had been a pioneer of the open systems movement. As one writer stated, "In some ways, SCO was Linux before Linux, popularizing Unix on low-cost Intel machines." In August 2002, Caldera International renamed itself The SCO Group since the SCO Unix products were still their greatest source of revenue due to the large installed base they had. That entity soon started the SCO-Linux controversies. Those familiar with the Santa Cruz Operation, including those who worked there and those who wrote about it, became protective of that company's reputation, especially given the possible name confusion regarding the role The SCO Group played in the attacks on Linux. As former Santa Cruz Operation employee wrote later about The SCO Group, "I'll spare you the sordid legal details, but by then, it was no longer our SCO." == Company culture ==
Company culture
Santa Cruz atmosphere From its inception and co-founding by UC Santa Cruz graduate Doug Michels, the company drew upon the readily available technical talent who chose to remain in the central California coastal town of Santa Cruz after graduating. But the town and university affected the company as well. SCO was at the center of the Santa Cruz tech scene, with many employees moving from it to other tech companies or vice versa. Some of the feel of the SCO offices was carried forward in coworking facilities later set up in Santa Cruz by two former SCO employees. New products were promoted with mock film posters. whose credits included having designed the "flying toasters" cover of the Jefferson Airplane's 1973 live album Thirty Seconds Over Winterland. From its earliest days through to its last ones, The Santa Cruz Operation was known for reflecting the casual ambience of its namesake town. SCO Forum Beginning in 1987, SCO hosted an annual Summer conference for the international Unix community. Called SCO Forum, it was held on the University of California, Santa Cruz's scenic redwood-forested campus overlooking Monterey Bay, drew some 2000–3000 attendees, and lasted for much of a week. Featured speakers over the years included Douglas Adams, Scott Adams, Dave Barry, Musical entertainment included concerts by Jefferson Starship, Tower of Power, Roger McGuinn, Jan & Dean, The Kingsmen, The Surfaris, and Deth Specula. Due to its useful content and its relaxed, fun atmosphere, SCO Forum became known as one of the best such conferences to go to in the industry and was viewed fondly by those who attended. Palookaville webcasts Following the first live Internet concert in 1994, SCO continued in that tradition by sponsoring and producing a series of live Internet webcasts from the popular Santa Cruz night club Palookaville. These webcasts demonstrated the use of UnixWare 7 as a real-time audio and video webcasting server utilizing RealAudio and RealVideo technologies from RealNetworks. Trapping a hacker SCO was a target of one of the most publicized security hackers of the 1980s and 1990s, Kevin Mitnick, who broke into the company's systems in 1987. SCO's staff detected his intrusions and engaged in exchanges with him that allowed them to track his activities. After about a week of this, it appeared that the intruder was trying to modify or copy Xenix code. Authorities having been notified, the phone line Mitnick was using for the intrusions was discovered and he was arrested. On September 22, 2012, the SCO Alumni Association hosted the SCOGala Reunion party at the Cocoanut Grove, which included the first SCO Follies since 2001. Some 500 former employees, friends, and family attended the event. == Alliances ==
Alliances
SCO was a primary partner in several industry alliances, intended to promote SCO operating system technology as a de facto standard for emerging hardware platforms. The most notable of these were: • The ACE Consortium: Founded by Compaq, Microsoft, MIPS Computer Systems, Silicon Graphics, Digital Equipment Corporation, and SCO in 1991, to drive the next generation of PCs powered by the Advanced RISC Computing Specification (ARC) • 3DA: Formed by SCO and Hewlett-Packard in 1995, to define the standard Unix for IA-32 and later IA-64 systems • Uniform Driver Interface: Led by SCO and with work starting in 1997, the UDI project sought to establish an OS-neutral and platform-neutral portable interface for writing device drivers. The UDI project had the backing of Intel, HP, IBM, Compaq, Sun, and others. • Project Monterey: Formed by SCO, IBM, Sequent and Intel in 1998, to define the standard UNIX for IA-64 systems. Also intended to merge some of the proprietary Unix products afloat at the time. None of these alliances were ultimately successful. SCO was also part of 1993's COSE initiative, a more successful and broadly supported initiative to create an open and unified UNIX standard. SCO was a founding member of 86open (1997–1999), hosting the first meeting of the Unix on Intel standards effort. == See also ==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com