Proponents Elizabethan scholar
John Dee makes references to a language he called "
Angelical", which he recorded in his private journals and those of
scryer Edward Kelley. Dee's journals did not describe the language as "
Enochian", instead preferring "Angelical", the "Celestial Speech", the "Language of Angels", the "First Language of God-Christ", the "Holy Language", or "Adamical" because, according to Dee's Angels, it was used by Adam in Paradise to name all things. The language was later dubbed Enochian, due to Dee's assertion that the
Biblical Patriarch Enoch had been the last human (before Dee and Kelley) to know the language. Dutch physician, linguist, and humanist
Johannes Goropius Becanus (1519–1572) theorized in
Origines Antwerpianae (1569) that
Antwerpian
Babrantic, spoken in the region between the
Scheldt and
Meuse Rivers, was the original language spoken in Paradise. Goropius believed that the most ancient language on Earth would be the simplest language, and that the simplest language would contain mostly short words. Since Brabantic has a higher number of short words than do Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, Goropius reasoned that it was the older language. His work influenced that of
Simon Stevin (1548–1620), who espoused similar ideas in "Uytspraeck van de weerdicheyt der Duytse tael", a chapter in
De Beghinselen Der Weeghconst (1586). By the 17th century, Adamic was the most popular theory of the nature of language.
Opponents The existence and nature of the alleged Adamic language was commonly discussed amongst European Jewish and Christian mystics and primitive linguists.
Robert Boyle (1627–1691) was skeptical that Hebrew was the language best capable of describing the nature of things, stating: I could never find, that the Hebrew names of animals, mentioned in the beginning of Genesis, argued a (much) clearer insight into their natures, than did the names of the same or some other animals in Greek, or other languages (1665:45).
John Locke (1632–1704) expressed similar skepticism in his
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690). == Modern period ==