Critical response has been mixed.
Jay Allen Sanford of the
San Diego Reader commented positively on the episode. Journalist and
Space: 1999 fan Shaqui Le Vesconte called it "one of the best stories, featuring a twist to the usual '
ghost story' with an Alphan haunted by his future self seeking vengeance for his death. The use of Indian
sitar music gives this tale a quite unique and chilling atmosphere." David Scott of
Dreamwatch Bulletin regarded the episode as the best of
Space: 1999s first series: "Perhaps this one stands out because mood pieces are rare in
Space: 1999 [...]" Although he conceded that the episode "doesn't make a lot of logical sense" and has "another of those open-mouthed endings", he found the premise "a nice idea, pursued with an excellent spooky atmosphere." A later
Dreamwatch article praised the episode as "a television rarity – a genuinely scary ghost story", with a "brilliantly sustained" introduction.
SFX magazine rated the episode "A-plus".
Video Watchdogs John Charles found the episode "satisfying if predictable", helped by its "transplanting of horror standbys (like a
séance and a discussion of
exorcism) into a futuristic setting", as well as its "atmospheric moments" and "eerie" use of sitar.
TV Zones Richard Houldsworth called it "a mediocre
1999 story; as ever it is impeccably made, but the basic idea is rather corny [...] and features some implausible moments [...]" He also wrote that as the series' "first attempt at a supernatural story", it was "perhaps too successful for its own good". However, he praised its "remarkable camera work", particularly the use of
tracking shots, as well as the "eerie lighting" and Mateo's "sterling prosthetics make-up". He also noted that despite the episode's horror content, in some parts of the UK it was first shown in a morning children's
timeslot, which "must surely have proved too much for some young stomachs."
John Kenneth Muir praised the direction, music and performances, but found aspects of the plot (such as the plants' relationship to the spirit) confusing, commenting: "[o]ne wishes that Austin were using all that directorial skill in the service of a more comprehensible story."
SciFiNow magazine rated the episode 2 out of 5, calling it "abject nonsense that's just saved by the earnest delivery of the cast".
Dreamwatch Bulletin found Landau and Bain's acting "hammy" and detrimental to the story. ==Novelisation==