The First Quarter: A 25-Year History of Video Games was well received by the game enthusiast press, though it was criticized for lack of editorial rigor. Brian Deuel of Syzygy Magazine gave it 4/5 stars, saying "Notwithstanding the problems within the text, you'd be hard-pressed to find a better book about the history of video games."
LudoScience called it "an absolute must-read for anyone interested in the history of video games".
Computer Gaming World described it as "Packed with interesting stories and anecdotes from all the key players on any game you could think of, it's a fascinating book for the well-read gamer." Mark Androvich writing for Classic Gamer Magazine praised its prescience as a foundational work in the young subject of video game history.
The Ultimate History of Video Games received much more attention upon its release.
Next Generation gave the book five out of five stars in their a 2001 holiday buying guide reviewing several game history related books. Charles Ardai wrote in Computer Gaming World praised its nuanced coverage of certain subjects, though criticized its black and white photographs and said the later part of the book "gets a little dry". Tim Rotertson at
MyMac.com called Kent a "gifted writer" and gave the book a 5/5 rating, but suggested that it should have been multiple volumes for more depth. Retrospective reviews have largely praised the breadth of the book's coverage.
Nintendo Life in 2020 called the book Kent's "seminal work".
Publishers Weekly noted Kent's "infectious enthusiasm" and called the book "a loving tribute" to the videogame industry.
The Ultimate History of Video Games has been widely cited by other work covering video games including academic publications.
The First Quarter was adopted as a textbook by the
DigiPen Institute of Technology soon after its release. ==References==