Critical The Monthly Film Bulletin said "The treatment of this story provides an unfortunate example of the malaise with which so much British script-writing is afflicted nowadays. The basic situation is promising" but "against these back-grounds are paraded a prize collection of familiar feminine character types (alternately comic, sad and hysterical) – two-dimensional creatures, observed without insight or real compassion."
The New York Times called it "a lukewarm drama".
Variety called it "a safe formula for a box office meller." In
The Radio Times Guide to Films Sue Heal gave the film 3/5 stars, writing: "This is one of those riveting women's prison pictures full of sneering warders and snarling, sulky inmates that alternates alarmingly between enlightening social comment and overloaded melodrama. A robust cast that contains all the usual suspects (there's a fine performance from Diana Dors) acts out the story, which provides a meaty glimpse behind the clanging doors." In
British Sound Films: The Studio Years 1928–1959 David Quinlan rated the film as "average", writing: "Familiar types in rose-coloured view of prison life."
Leslie Halliwell wrote "Predictable portmanteau drama with stalwart performances." According to Steven Vagg in
Filmink, the film changed perceptions of Diana Dors.
Box office According to
Kinematograph Weekly the film was a "money maker" at the British box office in 1954. The
National Film Finance Corporation stated the film made a comfortable profit. It was estimated to earn between $75,000 and $100,000 for Associated British in the U.S. ==Legacy==