Social alienation One theme of ''Giovanni's Room
is social alienation. Susan Stryker notes that prior to writing Giovanni's Room'', James Baldwin had recently
emigrated to Europe and "felt that the effects of
racism in the United States would never allow him to be seen simply as a writer, and he feared that being tagged as gay would mean he couldn't be a writer at all."
Sexuality and race Scholar
Josep Armengol wrote that at the time of its publication, the book was viewed as being "raceless", but that actually "in
Giovanni’s Room, race is deflected onto sexuality with the result that
whiteness is transvalued [sic] as heterosexuality, just as homosexuality becomes associated with blackness, both literally and metaphorically." Baldwin "transvalues" these traditionally "binary opposites" by establishing "color-full associations" between whiteness and heterosexuality, on the one hand, and blackness and homosexuality on the other. All characters are portrayed through David’s experiences and prejudices; he is the representation of whiteness; he is tall and blond-haired; he grows up in a
toxic environment regarding masculinity; and he struggles throughout the novel between his
internalised homophobia and his sexuality. On the contrary, Joey and Giovanni, the two men David had relations with, are both described as dark by David. Giovanni, in particular, is coded as black in David’s perception. First, it is said that Giovanni’s enthusiasm is of a “blacker brand” than his, stating a clear difference between the two men. Furthermore,
Italians immigrating to the United States were for a long time
considered not to be white; they had special cases in the form of immigration as 'North Italian' or 'Sicilian' rather than whites. It was not until the mid-1950s, when the book was published, that
Italian Americans were beginning to be considered whites. It is suggested that Italians acquire
white status and privileges in the United States, so Italians living in Italy are still viewed as coloured or non-whites. In the novel, David clearly has this mindset, and it shows in his perception of Giovanni. David felt superior to Giovanni also because of his social class, which is also a sign of his 'blackness'.
White people in the United States, especially from
upper-class families like David, often view non-whites as inferior. Indeed, Giovanni came from a poor village in
southern Italy and had in Paris a
precarious job as a bartender with a small wage with which he could only provide for himself, and his class made him darker for someone like David with all his prejudices. Baldwin, in
Giovanni’s Room, deconstructed the discourse about sexuality and race and highlighted that the idea that whiteness opposed blackness and heterosexuality opposed homosexuality is false and that they are related and dependent. The novel was viewed as a 'raceless' novel, thus being studied mainly in sexual manners rather than racial studies, but it clearly challenges the notion of a novel about white people having no race.
Masculinity David grapples with insecurities pertaining to his masculinity throughout the novel. He spends much of his time comparing himself to every man he meets, ensuring that his performative masculinity allows him to "pass" while negotiating the public sphere. For David, masculinity is intertwined with
sexual identity, and thus he believes that his same-sex desires act against his masculinity. One of David’s prominent male figures is his alcoholic father, with whom he holds a complex and sensitive relationship. After a drunk driving incident, David is met by his father in the hospital, where his father repeatedly reassures David that he "is going to be all right", to which David replies "Daddy" and begins to cry. This moment of expected vulnerability from David and his father cements the pain behind their relationship, which can be seen to cause David to put up a front of masculinity, which—to him—does not coincide with his sexual attractions.
Manhood The phrase 'manhood' repeats throughout the book, in much the same ways that masculinity manifests itself. The difference between the two themes, in this case, is that David's manhood seems to be more to do with his sexual relationships, whereas his masculinity is guided by learned public behaviours he claims to inherit from his father. The self-loathing and projecting that ensues seem to depict the final blow to a man who already had a great amount of
dysphoria. Baldwin's positioning of manhood within the narrative aligns it also with nationhood, sexuality and all facets of performance within the public sphere.
Josep Armengol linked Baldwin's description of manhood as a way of him navigating his experiences of blackness in the LGBTQ+ community, particularly when David describes his earliest same-sex encounter with a boy called Joey. In this description "black" becomes a motif for experience and his dark thoughts surrounding Joey and his body. Recent scholarship has focused on the more precise designation of bisexuality within the novel. Several scholars have claimed that the characters can be more accurately seen as bisexual, namely David and Giovanni. As Maiken Solli claims, though most people read the characters as gay/homosexual, "a bisexual perspective could be just as valuable and enlightening in understanding the book, as well as exposing the bisexual experience." Though the novel is considered a homosexual and bisexual novel, Baldwin has on occasion stated that it was "not so much about homosexuality, it is what happens if you are so afraid that you finally cannot love anybody". The novel's protagonist, David, seems incapable of deciding between Hella and Giovanni and expresses both hatred and love for the two, though he often questions if his feelings are authentic or superficial.
Internalised homophobia Leading on from David’s issues with his masculinity, another key dilemma became prevalent – David’s struggle with internalised
homophobia. As Alaina Masanto states, David “has internalized the social hatred directed towards him”. This problem presses onto David's psyche and becomes alarmingly apparent in his first encounter with Giovanni. As they meet in a Parisian gay bar, David appears reluctant to speak to Giovanni, though once their conversation begins, he falls in love. He continuously denies these feelings, until he cannot, and he ends up repeatedly staying in Giovanni's room, which David describes as dark and dingy, a room of shame and sin. Santiago Herrera describes this darkness that David sees in the room, stating: "Just as the tightening noose of heteronormative oppression gets ever closer to David through Hella, so too does the painting remind him of his indecision. Giovanni's room is dark, with only one window with soaped-up panes instead of curtains for privacy and trash all over. When the boys go out, it's in the early mornings or at night, before or after Giovanni's shifts as a bartender. Their lives are always shrouded in a darkness of some kind, and it only worsens when Hella comes to Paris." David's push–pull relationship with Giovanni and his murky relationship with Hella showcase his torn mental state; he finds himself falling into this 'dark side' yet he cannot pull himself out of it as a result of his internalised homophobia.
Question of Categories Matt Brim explores
Giovanni’s Room not just as a homosexual or gay text, but one about the failure of love due to the confining and limiting nature of gender and sexuality when understood as static categories. He quotes Baldwin on the initial publication, “
Giovanni’s Room is not really about homosexuality. . . . It’s about what happens to you if you’re afraid to love anybody.” The tragedy comes from repressing love when seeing it as dirty and incorrect. Presenting gender and sexuality categories as inhuman and limiting have always been part of Baldwin’s work, highlighted in his early essay, ‘“Everybody’s Protest Novel”’, as quoted by Brim, “[T]he failure of the protest novel,” Baldwin writes, “lies in its rejection of life, the human being, the denial of his beauty, dread, power, in its insistence that it is his categorization alone which is real and which cannot be transcended.” David is trapped by the explicit labels of ‘man’ and ‘American’, as well as the implicit labels, ‘homosexual’, 'gay', or ‘bisexual’. As an American, middle-class, white man, he must marry a girl of his class and have babies for his parents to dote on, whilst he represses a strong love for Giovanni and is attracted to other men, such as Joey and the blond sailor. David is fearful of the associations from being with Giovanni or other men, and prescribes himself a
heteronormative life, causing pain for himself and everyone in his life.
The Failure of Queer Imagination One aspect of the novel is the presentation of inevitability, not dissimilar from
Greek tragedy. On the first page, we learn that Giovanni will die and David is alone. The novel is narrated in the present with David remediating his memories, meaning every character is presented by him. Readers should always be critical of David for this and his unreliability. In his self-reflections, David often comments on the inevitability of his breakup with Giovanni and the failure of his relationship with Hella, and that his partners knew they were doomed. It is unknown if David thought this at the time or is a product of hindsight, and shifting the blame from himself to both partners to share it. Matt Brim codes this inevitable tragedy as the failure of queer imagination, defining it as allowing oneself to firstly accept themselves and conceptualise themself as queer, then imagine and create their place within society, whether in a heteronormative society or outside of it. David acknowledges that while loves Hella, he was always with her more out of necessity than genuine love and desire for marriage and family. With Giovanni, he loves him deeply, but David can't accept that love or be with him because he cannot imagine what their life could be within heteronormative society. This exemplified in part of Giovanni and David's final argument:'At least you are starting to be honest. And do you know
why you want to get away from me?' Inside me something locked. 'I cannot have a life with you,' I said. [...] 'But I'm a man,' I cried, 'A man! What do you think can
happen between us?' 'You know very well,' Giovanni said slowly, 'what can happen between us. It is for that reason you are leaving me.'Giovanni in this scene, and somewhat beforehand, is desperately lonely and mentally unwell whilst desperately and destructively in love with David. In their final real conversation, Giovanni thoroughly summarises David’s issues with himself and their relationship: ‘‘You are the one who keeps talking about
what I want. But I have only been talking about
who I want.’’ David is so concerned with his social status and what people think of him, with his inability to imagine a queer future where he could be happy, that he projects his desires onto Giovanni. Perhaps his memory has simplified Giovanni’s problems into David’s subconscious commenting on his inability to let himself love Giovanni, or perhaps Giovanni is so alone and in need of support that he sees David as an anchor. It is also personal, the ‘
who’ over the ‘
what’. David can only imagine an unhappy future where he performs the role he believes was laid out for him and distances his love from his social desire. This exchange encapsulates David's self-hatred and inability to imagine his future queerly. == Adaptations ==