While thermal imaging technology has long been in use in specialized law enforcement and military applications, While rapidly becoming standard in naval firefighting following the sinking of , thermal imaging remained specialist equipment in the civilian fire services through into the 1990s. The
Seattle Fire Department acquired its first thermal imaging camera in 1997, for a cost of $16,000. In 2000, the
Los Angeles Times called the thermal imaging camera "[p]erhaps the best advance in fire equipment in the last 25 years—and the most expensive". Fire departments have pursued various sources and methods to fund thermal imaging cameras including direct budgeting, and charity donations, among others. One fire chief observed that the same sorts of cost issues plagued
SCBA acquisitions during their initial adoption. However, replacing a damaged thermal imaging camera can be a substantial challenge for a department which acquired the camera outside the normal budget process. As departments began acquiring thermal imaging cameras, they were typically assigned to specialized units, such as heavy rescue and truck companies. Since 2003, the lack of a properly used thermal imaging camera has been recognized by
NIOSH as an avoidable factor contributing to firefighter injuries and deaths, and the fact that a thermal imaging cameras not used was cited in a 2005 NIOSH report as a contributing factor to the 2004 line of duty death of Houston firefighter Kevin Kulow. One of the recommendations of the
Charleston Sofa Super Store fire post incident assessment and review team was "the purchase of a standard model thermal imaging camera for each engine and ladder company". ==See also==