As some authors and users have observed, the thermal design power (TDP) rating is an ambiguous parameter. In fact, different manufacturers define the TDP using different calculation methods and different operating conditions, keeping these details almost undisclosed (with very few exceptions). This makes highly problematic (if not impossible) to reasonably compare similar devices made by different manufacturers based on their TDP, and to optimize the design of a cooling system in terms of both heat management and cost.
Thermal management fundamentals To better understand the problem we must remember the basic concepts underlying
thermal management and
computer cooling. Here they also inform that starting from the 12th generation of their
CPUs the term
thermal design power (TDP) has been replaced with
processor base power (PBP). In a support page dedicated to the
Core i7-7700 processor,
Intel defines the TDP as the maximum amount of heat that a processor can produce when running real life applications, without telling what these "real life applications" are. Another example: in a 2011 white paper where the
Xeon processors are compared with
AMD’s competing devices,
Intel defines TDP as the upper point of the thermal profile measured at maximum case temperature, but without specifying what this temperature should be (nor the computing load). All these definitions imply that the
CPU is running at the base clock rate (non-turbo). In conclusion: • Comparing the TDP between devices of different manufacturers is not very meaningful. • The selection of a
heat sink may end up with overheating (and
CPU reduced performances) or overcooling (oversized, expensive
heat sink ), depending if one chooses a too high or a too low case temperature Tc (respectively with a too low or too high ambient temperature Ta), or if the
CPU operates with different computational loads. • A possible approach to ensure a long life of a
CPU is to ask the manufacturer the recommended maximum case temperature Tc and then to oversize the cooling system. For instance, a safety margin taking into account some turbo
overclocking could consider a thermal power that is 1.5 times the rated TDP. In any case, the lower is the silicon
junction temperature, the longer will be the lifespan of the device, according to an acceleration factor very roughly expressed by means of the
Arrhenius equation. === Some disclosed details of
AMD’s thermal design power (TDP)=== In October 2019, the GamersNexus hardware guides showed a table with case and ambient temperature values that they got directly from
AMD, describing the TDPs of some
Ryzen 5, 7 and 9
CPUs. The formula relating all these parameters, given by
AMD, is the usual : TDP=(Tc-Ta)/Rca The declared TPDs of these devices range from 65 W to 105 W; the ambient temperature considered by
AMD is +42
°C, and the case temperatures range from +61.8 °C to +69.3°C, while the case-to-ambient thermal resistances range from 0.189 to 0.420 °C/W. == See also ==