Gangale has contributed to international space law through analyses of orbital regimes, property rights, and governance frameworks for extraterrestrial activities. In his 2006 article "Who Owns the Geostationary Orbit?", published in the Annals of Air and Space Law (Vol. 31), he critiques claims of national sovereignty over segments of the
geostationary orbit (GSO) advanced in the 1976
Bogotá Declaration by equatorial states. Drawing on
astrodynamics, analogies to terrestrial sovereignty claims,
customary international law, and the language of the 1967
Outer Space Treaty, Gangale argues that the GSO forms part of outer space and is not subject to national appropriation. The paper refutes the Bogotá Declaration's assertion that the GSO is a distinct natural resource outside outer space, emphasizing that no treaty or UN resolution distinguishes the GSO from other orbits. This work has been referenced in subsequent scholarship on orbital governance and the legal status of geosynchronous positions. Gangale's work in space law critiques established concepts and advocates for frameworks supporting space activities. In "The Non Kármán Line: An Urban Legend of the Space Age" (Journal of Space Law, 2015/2016), he debunks the
Kármán line—a notional boundary at approximately 100 km altitude often cited as the edge of space—as lacking scientific or legal basis, arguing it is an urban legend perpetuated without formal adoption in international law. This article, drawn from his doctoral research, challenges the arbitrary delimitation of outer space and territorial airspace, proposing alternative approaches based on functional, spatial, temporal, and hybrid criteria. On extraterrestrial resource utilization, Gangale defends the legality of mining on the
Moon and
asteroids for profit under existing treaties. In "The Legality of Mining Celestial Bodies" (Journal of Space Law, Vol. 40, No. 1-2, 2017), he argues there is no moratorium on mining celestial bodies in international law, tracing historical statements and treaty interpretations to support commercial exploitation without national appropriation. He posits that the 1963
Outer Space Treaty allows resource use, including profitable extraction. In publications such as "Myths of the Moon Agreement" (2008) and his book
The Development of Outer Space: Sovereignty and Property Rights in International Space Law (2009), he argues for reviving the 1979
Moon Agreement to establish regulated regimes for resource exploitation, countering claims that it prohibits commercial mining. He critiques opposition to the Moon Agreement as rooted in misconceptions. Additional works like "Castles in the Air: Debunking the Space Settlement Prize" (2008) and "A Limited International Agreement on Property Rights" (2007) explore property rights models that enable commercial activities while preserving common heritage principles. ==Martian geography projects==