Lawyers, Clients, and Moral Responsibility Thomas Shaffer argues that legal practice is a moral activity. He maintains that conversations in law offices are fundamentally moral conversations because legal decisions impact people. For Shaffer, legal representation is an opportunity for both lawyer and client to become better moral agents. A central theme is Shaffer’s critique of the “lawyer as godfather” model. In this model, lawyers dominate decision-making for clients, focusing primarily on financial success and legal advantage while disregarding the moral consequences of actions on others. These lawyers act
paternalistically, often treating clients as objects or children rather than autonomous persons. Shaffer argues that this paternalism ultimately restricts client freedom rather than enhancing it, leading clients toward selfish outcomes rather than moral choices. Shaffer also criticizes the
professional norm of non-accountability, the idea that lawyers are not morally responsible for the means they use or the ends they achieve when advocating for clients. He rejects the assumption that lawyers are morally superior to clients, noting that clients often possess strong moral values. Rather than being “occasions of sin,” clients frequently wrestle seriously with moral questions and may seek the lawyer’s help in doing so. True respect for client autonomy, in Shaffer’s view, includes helping clients make informed and thoughtful decisions about the kind of people they are becoming, not simply maximizing their legal freedom. Instead, Shaffer promotes a model of lawyering grounded in mutual moral accountability. Lawyers should assist clients in making informed choices about how they exercise their freedom and about the kind of persons they are becoming. Drawing on
Socratic ethics, Shaffer emphasizes moral character, collaboration, mercy, and restraint, including the justice that can arise from not asserting one’s rights. ==Major works==