The introduction of the thousandth of an inch as a base unit in engineering and machining is generally attributed to
Joseph Whitworth who wrote in 1857: ... instead of our engineers and machinists thinking in eighths, sixteenths and thirty-seconds of an inch, it is desirable that they should think and speak in tenths, hundredths, and thousandths ... Whitworth's main point was to advocate
decimalization in place of fractions based on successive halving; but in mentioning thousandths, he was also broaching the idea of a finer division than had been used previously. Until then, workers such as
millwrights,
boilermakers, and
machinists in the
Anglosphere measured only in traditional fractions of an inch, divided via successive halving, usually only as far as 64ths (1, , , , , , ). Each 64th is about 16 thou. Communication about sizes smaller than a 64th of an inch was subjective and hampered by a degree of
ineffability—while phrases such as "scant 64th" or "heavy 64th" were used, they were imprecise. Dimensions and geometry
could be controlled to high accuracy, but this was done by comparative methods: comparison against templates or other gauges, feeling the degree of drag of calipers, or simply repeatably cutting, relying on the positioning consistency of jigs, fixtures, and machine slides. Such work could only be done in craft fashion: on-site, by feel, rather than at a distance working from drawings and written notes. Although measurement was certainly a part of the daily routine, the highest-precision aspects of the work were achieved by feel or by gauge, not by measuring (as in determining counts of units). This in turn limited the kinds of
process designs that could work, because they limited the degree of
separation of concerns that could occur. The introduction of the thou as a base unit for machining work required the dissemination of
vernier calipers and screw
micrometers throughout the trade, as the unit is too small to be measured with practical repeatability using
rulers alone. (Most rule markings were far too wide to mark a single mil, and even if such
dividing is accomplished, it is unclear to the naked eye, being discernible but not useful for measuring.) During the following half century, such measuring instruments, previously expensive rarities, became widespread, everyday tools among machinists. Bringing more
metrology into machining made possible, for example, designing an assembly in the form of an
engineering drawing, then having the
mating parts made at different firms who did not have any contact with (or even awareness of) each other—yet still being sure that their products would have the desired
fit. == See also ==