The Rosen Electronics Letter in February 1983 said that the Professional "comes with a full array of features and a price that should help it win in competition with the IBM PC". Noting TI's decision to follow the PC's MS-DOS and Intel 8088 standards, the newsletter approved of the "impressive array of more than 100 packages" available immediately, as well as a
Z80 SoftCard and TI's proprietary speech technology.
Rosen predicted that the Professional "should be one of the year's biggest successes ... although we'd rather it had been completely compatible with the PC", adding that "we know of one case (and there will be many)" where a customer chose the PC because of "the name, the trustworthiness and most important of all the identity of IBM".
Personal Computer World in May 1983 was surprised that TI did not use its own CPU in Professional. The magazine approved of the hardware design and documentation, and found that the natural-language interface worked well if slowly.
PCW questioned Professional's ability, however, to challenge the PC's dominance: "I liked the machine as long as I thought about it as a new business machine from TI — I got a little worried about it when I thought of it as an IBM PC work-alike".
Byte in December 1983 praised its "well, wonderful" keyboard and quality design, and said that the display "is one of its most outstanding features". The magazine reported that
BASIC 1.1 was buggy and had poor documentation, but that 1.2 had fixed the bugs and a much improved manual.
Byte concluded that for non-novice buyers willing to purchase most peripherals from TI, the Professional was "a machine that is superior in many ways. It invites a closer look". ==Software==