While some authors have considered
Gigantocamelus and
Titanotylopus to be congeneric, others have maintained them separately. Voorhies and Corner, based on previously unreported material, documented that the two are indeed worthy of separate generic status. Harrison (1985) followed Voorhies and Corner in advocating the use of
Titanotylopus for only
T. nebraskensis, based on a lower
jaw, and
Gigantocamelus for
G. spatulus, which includes
G. fricki. There is a clear difference between the proximal phalanx of specimens assigned to
Gigantocamelus and to
Titanotylopus, based on
skeletons associated with
skull material. ==See also==