Mamluk period One of the earliest known references to the tomb comes from an unnamed student of the
Ramban who visited the site between 1289 and 1290. He wrote of visiting the "cave of Jesse's grave" on a hilltop near the Cave of Machpela and the ancient
Jewish Cemetery of Hebron. Yaakov HaShaliach, a Jewish traveller, mentions visiting the grave of Jesse, father of David in Hebron in the year 1235, but he does not specify the burial place. Rabbi
Ovadia of Bertinoro (1445-1515) mentions praying there in his travel writings.
Ottoman era In 1522, Rabbi
Moses ben Mordecai Bassola wrote,
Yihus HaAvos V'Neviim (Lineage of the Patriarch and the Prophets) a book from 1537 refers to the site as "a handsome building up on the mount, where Jesse, the King David's father is buried." It includes a drawing of the site, and notes an "ancient Israelite burial ground" nearby and Crusader courtyard.
Karaite travellers wrote of the site, Samuel ben David of Crimea in 1642, and Benjamin Ben-Eliyahu in 1785., The first known written reference to the site housing the tomb of both Jesse and Ruth comes from the 1835 book
Love of Jerusalem by Haim Horwitz, referencing local oral traditions.
Menachem Mendel of Kamenitz wrote in 1839,
British Mandate During the British Mandate era (1917-1948), the Tomb of Jesse and Ruth was recognized as one of the many historic sites associated with Jewish tradition in the Land of Israel. The site was visited and described by several scholars, geographers, and archaeologists who documented its condition and folklore at the time. The French Dominican archaeologist and scholar
Louis-Hugues Vincent (1872–1960), who lived and worked in Jerusalem, made extensive studies of ancient sites in the region during the early 20th century. In his seminal two volume work on Hebron, published in 1923, Vincent discussed the ruins of Deir al-Arbaʿeen: the complex within which the tomb traditionally ascribed to Jesse and Ruth is located. His work provided one of the earliest modern archaeological descriptions of the structure and its local traditions, situating it within the broader historical landscape of Hebron. In 1935, the noted Israeli geographer and travel writer
Zev Vilnay visited the tomb as part of his survey of holy places in the Land of Israel. Vilnay recorded that local custodians at the site claimed the tomb once connected by a subterranean passage to the nearby
the Cave of the Patriarchs. According to his account, this supposed passageway was filled in during the
First World War, and the entrance was no longer known by the time he visited. Archaeologist
Jacob Pinkerfield (1897–1956) also examined the site during the Mandate period. Pinkerfield included discussions of the tomb and its synagogue in his 1945/46 book The Synagogues in Eretz Yisra’el, in which he surveyed ancient synagogue sites and Jewish sacred places throughout the country. His observations contributed to recognizing the site’s dual character as both a burial tradition and a place of historical Jewish worship.
Jordanian period (1948–1967) Following the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Hebron came under Jordanian rule, and Jewish access to sites in the city was effectively barred. Jewish communities were expelled from the area, and many historic Jewish sites, including components of the ancient cemetery adjacent to Tel Rumeida, were neglected or desecrated during this period. Around 4,000 tombstones were removed from the
old Jewish cemetery and repurposed for construction. Although specific documentation of the Tomb of Jesse and Ruth’s condition during this time is limited, the site remained inaccessible and fell into disrepair along with other Jewish heritage sites in Hebron.
Post-1967 Following the 1967 Six Day War and the transfer of control of Hebron to Israel, Jewish access to sites on Tel Rumeida, including the Tomb of Jesse and Ruth, gradually resumed. In the 1970s, the site was examined and partially excavated by Professor
Ben Zion Tavger, who documented
architectural remains and worked to clear debris that had accumulated over previous decades. As a result of this work, the site was reopened to visitors, marking its first regular public access since 1948. In the decades that followed, the tomb functioned primarily as a modest prayer site, receiving periodic maintenance but no large scale development. Access remained limited, and the structure retained a largely unmodernized character. During this period, the site was occasionally referenced in archaeological and heritage discussions relating to Tel Rumeida, though it remained secondary to larger excavation areas in the vicinity. == Modern Structural Improvements and Religious Growth ==