Kevin Thomas, reviewing for
The Los Angeles Times, gave the film a negative review: "something that might have been made by a band of thumb-nosing high school students... a nasty business that lays waste to its large, gifted and game cast".
Peter Travers summed up his review for
Rolling Stone, "Downey has become what every true satirist fears most: outdated." Karl Soehnlein of
OutWeek wrote that "gays and lesbians may take the spotlight on the screen, but we seem to have been overlooked as potential audience members." Overall, he concluded that "there's very little a queer viewer will gain from watching this film". Film critic
Vincent Canby stated it is a "comedy of loosely strung together farcical situations that, played at half speed, elicit more good will than sustained laughter; much of the comedy, avoids good taste like the plague." Critic
Mick LaSalle said the film "turns out to be more than a disappointment, it's a disaster and a joyless laughless experience." Overall, he opined that "this is a mess, with a group of undefined characters inconsistently following the whims of a confused screenplay." Ralph Novak from
People Magazine wrote that it is an "insipid film with a lamebrain script". He went on to say that Ralph Macchio, has a "comedy touch that brings to mind a wrecking ball hitting a tree house; even Idle and Martin seem desperate."
Riese Bernard of
Autostraddle was not impressed, writing that "this film is not a hidden gem, it is a shame, and therefore hidden on purpose; it's not simply terrible, it is a stain upon humanity; it is a farce without whimsy, an aggressively unfunny comedy and an allegedly LGBT-inclusive film riddled with really fucked up jokes." Bernard concluded that "its badness is inescapable, like a rotting tuna sandwich in a parked car on a hot day; a day, perhaps, with too much sun." ==See also==