The Act sets out the legal framework for planning instruments and regulating land use and development in Victoria. The main instruments that allow for urban planning to be enabled in Victoria are: • The Act itself and relevant statutes • Ministerial Directions • Planning Provisions and Planning Schemes • Authorities and Enforcement • Appeals and Dispute Resolution The instruments of the Act allow tangible planning policies, such as the Planning Provisions and Planning Schemes to be created, amended and ultimately administered. Under Section S8, the Act also outlines the jurisdiction of the Minister for Planning and their ability to direct these provisions and schemes and the role of relevant authorities such as
local government area councils (LGAs) or municipalities. These positions are respectively known as "Planning Authorities" and "Responsible Authorities" with each role varying between setting out relevant policies and directions as well as enforcing the legislation through processes such as to permit applications and panels. In 1996, the Act saw the addition of the Planning and Environment (Planning Schemes) Act 1996, which set out a standardised and universal template for Planning Schemes called the Victorian Planning Provisions. The Provisions stipulates required documentation and inclusions regarding planning controls from LGAs. Generally, they must include the purpose and vision of the scheme, planning policy frameworks, zone and overlay controls, and other relevant provisions. Planning Schemes are a legally binding document that sets out planning controls for the use and development of land in the respective jurisdictions of LGAs. However, in some cases, the Minister is also responsible for certain applications and responsible for the application process and decision. For example, the
City of Melbourne has its own planning schemes relevant to its own geographical area. Both the Planning Provisions and Planning Schemes can be amended by both LGAs and the Minister for Planning. However, such desire to amend these documents have differing processes; The LGA must go through a formal process that the Minister must approve while the Minister can bypass these steps at their discretion under their responsibilities within S8. The nesting of a planning process between two levels of governments within the state creates a framework similar to a
judicial system such as the
Supreme Court of Victoria. By way of the Act, enforcement is generally administered through
planning permits and relevant processes for grounds of approval or refusal. Under Sections 47 to 71, this process is to ensure that the intended land use and development are aligned with the Act and both the Planning Provisions and Planning Scheme. Furthermore, responsible authorities can also direct applications with a 'Section 173 Agreement' that negotiates a consideration with an owner or developer of land to stipulate conditions or restrictions for land use and development or other objectives concerning it. Indeed, there are mechanisms in place for enforcement, non-compliance and
dispute resolution. Sections 114 allows a responsible authority or any person to apply to the
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal hand an enforcement order that can stop, not start, maintain or restore relevant actions to use and development. Additionally, Section 125 allows an escalation of disputes to the court system through requests for
injunctions for perceived non-compliance or enforcement orders. Finally, Section 130 allows responsible authorities to serve
infringement notices to any perceived non-compliance or contraventions in areas in which the authority is responsible. The enforcement of the act is also complemented by protections set out within its body but also complemented by other legislation such as the Heritage Act 2017 and Environmental Protection Act 2017 which can be administered through referrals in application or planning scheme overlays on a site. Yet, there have been criticisms of this enforcement mechanism, as seen with the non-compliance case of the demolition of the
Carlton Inn by developers in 2016 and the protracted legal proceedings between the developers, the State Government and the public community. ==Changes to the Act==