Fiordland Link Experience (rejected by NZ government 2014) This proposal intended to combine a number of innovative transport options into one trip (hence 'Experience'), while still cutting the travelling time to the Sound by about one hour each way (previous hopes of longer savings seem unlikely to be realised). In Queenstown travellers would have boarded catamarans capable of carrying up to 240 people. These would cross
Lake Wakatipu to the south-western shore, away. There, passengers would travel up the mountain on an existing back-country road, using specially constructed all-terrain coaches on balloon tyres (to reduce impact on the road). Arriving at the Kiwi Burn swing bridge terminal, tourists will continue on a mechanical (as opposed to maglev) monorail travelling 35 minutes through high country and native bush for a distance of , which would be the longest monorail connection in the world, before joining up with a bus park and ride facility on the existing road to Milford Sound north of Te Anau. Three passing loops along the line would allow four trains to run, at speeds of up to . Kiwi Burns Saddle, the highest point of the journey, is above sea level, and the higher-altitude section of the rail would be heated to prevent snow-buildup in winter. Each monorail train would seat 160 passengers, consisting of 16 articulated wide sections totalling in length. Only one train would be constructed initially. The proposal, which would have cost up to NZ$132 million, would have to achieve around 220,000 two-way passengers per year to be viable. Compared to the Milford Dart project, the backers, Infinity Investment Group, believed that they would have an easier time achieving consents, as the proposal does not touch upon any National Parks, and the construction and operation process was considered to be very ecologically sustainable, such as the use of comparatively small piles for the monorail which will be bored and placed from a working vehicle moving forward on the rail being constructed, thus making construction roads unnecessary. Originally it was hoped that the consent process would start in mid 2007, with commercial operations beginning in 2011. That, however, did not happen. In October 2013 it was reported that the New Zealand Conservation Minister was supportive of the project." On 29 May 2014, the Conservation Minister Nick Smith rejected the proposal saying the $240 million plan "does not stack up either economically or environmentally."
Milford Dart tunnel (rejected by NZ government 2013) Combining a new tunnel with special-purpose
guided buses to avoid the southern detour to Te Anau on the route from Queenstown to Milford Sound, this proposal would provide the shortest possible route. Proposed by a group of South Island businessmen who also have an interest in some of the tourist operations in the Sound, this scheme would make use of the fact that the
Hollyford Valley, where the existing road to Milford Sound from Te Anau turns west up to Homer Tunnel, is only a short distance away from the Routeburn Valley (of
Routeburn Track fame), in turn easily reached by existing roads. The proposed tunnel faces a number of criticisms. One of the major hindrances is the location of both entrances in national parks,
Fiordland National Park in the west and
Mount Aspiring National Park in the east. While the proposed new road sections would be very short, they have already led to criticism from the environmental group Forest and Bird which noted that the Department of Conservations's general policy forbids the construction of new roads in National Parks. The disposal of up to of soil from the tunnel excavation is also considered problematic.
Southland and
Te Anau business interests are also concerned that the tunnel proposal will cause tourism to bypass Te Anau and overwhelm Glenorchy. In December 2007, the
New Zealand Conservation Authority decided not to approve an amendment to the
Mount Aspiring National Park Management Plan that would have allowed the tunnel to be built in the Mount Aspiring National Park. The plan amendment had been supported by the Otago Conservation Board and the Director-General of Conservation. The
Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand said that the proposal is inconsistent with the National Parks Act, the Conservation Act, and the Fiordland and Mt Aspiring National Park Plans and that it is also inconsistent with the General Policy for National Parks. In January 2012, Minister of Conservation
Kate Wilkinson gave notice of her intention to grant a concession for the Milford Dart proposal, subject to public submissions and hearings.
Southland District Council Mayor
Frana Cardno submitted that the Department of Conservation's support of the proposal was inconsistent with the values of World Heritage status associated with Fiordland National Park. In mid 2013, the application for consent for the tunnel was rejected by the Minister for the Environment, for three reasons - the need to dispose of half a million of tonnes of tunnel spoil, the impacts of new roads and tunnel portals on the park and the Routeburn Track, and due to the works being inconsistent with the national park management plan. The minister also noted doubts about the economic viability of the $170 million project.
Sky Trail Milford (rejected by NZ government 2004) A third option, previously proposed around 2001, would have created a
gondola route between the Caples Valley and the
Hollyford Valley. The proposal was a cooperation between Skyline Enterprises of Queenstown and Rotorua, and the
Ngāi Tahu iwi, and was to cost around NZ$100–110 million. With length, the Skytrail would have become the longest such ride in the Southern Hemisphere, and was intended to transport 900 passengers per hour. With a duration of 35 minutes for a one-way trip, the gondola was to reduce the 12-hour round trip by about 3 hours. There was also some concern about the location of the Skytrail in an area of strong
seismic and wind activity. The scheme had some similarities to the 'Milford Dart' scheme, but apparently did not go forward apparently due to the high difficulties faced with building new infrastructure in the two national parks. ==Other constraints==