Box office According to MGM records, the film earned $1 million in the U.S. and Canada and $1.5 million elsewhere, resulting in an overall loss of $2,969,000.
Critical reaction Bosley Crowther of
The New York Times wrote: "The whole thing is a lot of glib trade patter, ridiculous and unconvincing snarls and a weird professional clash between the actor and director that is like something out of a Hollywood cartoon. Mr. Schnee's script is as aimless and arbitrary in its development of a plot as the script for one of those crowded Cinecitta spear-and-sandals spectacles, and the character it sets up for Mr. Douglas is no more intelligible or convincing than
Steve Reeves' Hercules." Larry Tubelle of
Variety felt the film was "not an achievement about which any of these creative people are apt to boast" as he complained "the characters are despicable as they are complex" and the photography was "evident but overshadowed by the overall dramatic mediocrity." ''
Harrison's Reports'' was critical of the script, writing "it failed in its fashioning into a powerful film yarn with all its emotional impact, plot-structural smoothness and dramatic tightness. It does not come through as a highly entertaining release." The
Chicago Tribune criticized the characters, publishing: "The scenery has a certain amount of charm, but the same can hardly be said for the people. They're a scheming, quarrelsome lot constantly trying to knife each other, both literally and figuratively [...] The acting is capable enough, but I found it hard to care very much about any of the characters."
Time magazine questioned: "Why is everybody so nasty? The script does not say. It simply leaves the customers to assume that Hollywood, no matter where you find it, is hell, and the people who run it are devils. It may be so, but this movie won't make anybody believe it or even care."
John Russell Taylor of
Sight and Sound criticized Minnelli's direction, writing "the early sequences are handled rather stolidly and sluggishly" and felt the frenzied car ride "comes dangerously close to self-parody." Philip K. Scheuer of the
Los Angeles Times felt "Minnelli has erred in staging it as heavy melodrama (which contrarily, I felt did suit the milieu of his previous 'Four Horsemen') and in allowing it if encouraging several of his players to exaggerate their theatrics to the verge of burlesque." The film's reputation has greatly improved over time.
Richard Brody of
The New Yorker called
Two Weeks in Another Town "one of the sharpest and most perceptive movies about the film industry."
David Thomson called it "underrated," writing in
The New Biographical Dictionary of Film that the film was "invested with such intense psychological detail that the narrative faults vanish."
Jonathan Rosenbaum wrote that it was "one of [Minnelli]'s last great pictures...The costumes, decor, and 'Scope compositions show Minnelli at his most expressive, and the gaudy intensity—as well as the inside detail about the movie business—makes this compulsively watchable." ==See also==